Jump to content


Please WG, would it be possible.......

please possible

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

Captain_Underpants53 #1 Posted 18 February 2022 - 03:10 AM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 49834 battles
  • 7,832
  • [94APS] 94APS
  • Member since:
    04-17-2017
......to automatically block any alternative name of someone we blocked in the past?   These trolls keep showing up on the forum with a new nickname.
MSgt, USAF, (ret)

CorvusCorvax #2 Posted 18 February 2022 - 03:33 AM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 7627 battles
  • 9,011
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostCaptain_Underpants53, on 18 February 2022 - 03:10 AM, said:

......to automatically block any alternative name of someone we blocked in the past?   These trolls keep showing up on the forum with a new nickname.

As a guy who used to own a hobbyist forum (anyone remember playing Quake online?), I could ban IPs and ranges of IPs, but VPNs make that kind of impossible now.

 

Some other guys required a real email (not one of the free services), but that's hard to do as well.

 

Offering forum tools to completely hide the folks who repeatedly sign up to troll the forum is about the only solution.  I guess another way would be to make the games played threshold higher.


I might not be King of the Hill, but I am the Prince of Potatoes.

F_RapThor #3 Posted 20 October 2022 - 12:17 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 12130 battles
  • 16
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    11-27-2013

Hello Admins/ Developers:

 

Here is my first complain as a gamer since 2013 , would be possible if Fighter missions and bomber missions split into two divisions or three ?

For say:

Bomber mission only

Bomber + Wingman ( Fighter / Heavy / Bomber)  mission only

Fighter / Heavy Mission only

I say this coz Lets's say if you are in tier T8-T10  and you are on a fighter or heavy and your opponents are both Bombers and they cap so fast in an imaginable way. why we as fighter planes continue playing? I rather fight with all bots rather lose on bombers.. That's very very unfair for other players who consistently fly fighter/heavy planes only. This game took a lot of players out of this game already. There should be a division we should select before playing the game. Its becoming an enormous disadvantage for non-bomber players just like me or others.

 

That's just side of my story,

F_RapThor aka AceRookie

 



XBK #4 Posted 02 November 2022 - 05:42 PM

    Publishing Producer

  • Developer
  • Manager
  • 0 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    03-13-2014

View PostF_RapThor, on 20 October 2022 - 02:17 AM, said:

Hello Admins/ Developers:

 

Here is my first complain as a gamer since 2013 , would be possible if Fighter missions and bomber missions split into two divisions or three ?

For say:

Bomber mission only

Bomber + Wingman ( Fighter / Heavy / Bomber)  mission only

Fighter / Heavy Mission only

I say this coz Lets's say if you are in tier T8-T10  and you are on a fighter or heavy and your opponents are both Bombers and they cap so fast in an imaginable way. why we as fighter planes continue playing? I rather fight with all bots rather lose on bombers.. That's very very unfair for other players who consistently fly fighter/heavy planes only. This game took a lot of players out of this game already. There should be a division we should select before playing the game. Its becoming an enormous disadvantage for non-bomber players just like me or others.

 

That's just side of my story,

F_RapThor aka AceRookie

 

Hi. No, dividing the audience into bomber-only and fighter-only queues would be detrimental to everyone.

We are working on matchmaker improvements.



tdave1953 #5 Posted 02 November 2022 - 09:28 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 13518 battles
  • 238
  • [R-A-W] R-A-W
  • Member since:
    03-16-2021

View PostXBK, on 02 November 2022 - 12:42 PM, said:

Hi. No, dividing the audience into bomber-only and fighter-only queues would be detrimental to everyone.

We are working on matchmaker improvements.

 

Good to hear. Not easy to do, I suppose. I would hope that the revised MM doesn't equate human ground attackers with human bombers. Been in flights with a couple of human bombers on one side and only a comparable number of human ground attackers on the other. Certainly in period 3 they're not equivalent.

 

To RapThor's point, though, period 3 bombers indeed need to be rebalanced so that LFs, MRFs, and GAAs can have a meaningful role to play in the battle. Sledgehammer nerfing of the bombers to the point of their being irrelevant wouldn't be good either, I think. Maintaining a competitive role for each class of plane should be the goal.



RoIand #6 Posted 02 November 2022 - 11:56 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6802 battles
  • 580
  • [USMIL] USMIL
  • Member since:
    07-05-2015

View PostXBK, on 02 November 2022 - 06:42 PM, said:

Hi. No, dividing the audience into bomber-only and fighter-only queues would be detrimental to everyone.

We are working on matchmaker improvements.

Oh - the MM is being worked on...
Should I be happy or should I be afraid of it ???  :B



MIrall #7 Posted 03 November 2022 - 01:46 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Moderator
  • 6 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-05-2015

View PostRoIand, on 02 November 2022 - 11:56 PM, said:

Oh - the MM is being worked on...
Should I be happy or should I be afraid of it ???  :B

Be afraid of your desires, they might come true.:ohmy:


Benefacta male locata malefacta arbitror

Marcus Tullius Cicerō


qu33kKC #8 Posted 03 November 2022 - 02:23 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 20654 battles
  • 2,185
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    10-14-2017

View PostMIrall, on 03 November 2022 - 01:46 AM, said:

Be afraid of your desires, they might come true.:ohmy:

 

o HEKK yeah, Corvus's alt is the new mod!!!!

 

*runs away laughing*



comealong1 #9 Posted 03 November 2022 - 02:41 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 15734 battles
  • 852
  • [_EFF_] _EFF_
  • Member since:
    06-05-2013
When the number of comments is three times more than number of games, get booted!!. We don't even want to hear from someone with less than 1000 battles in.. But their mouth over runneth and have over 3,000 comments.. Ban the ones with drastic differences in posts & battles played.. IT'S A START!

MIrall #10 Posted 03 November 2022 - 11:11 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Moderator
  • 6 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-05-2015

View Postqu33kKC, on 03 November 2022 - 02:23 AM, said:

 

o HEKK yeah, Corvus's alt is the new mod!!!!

 

*runs away laughing*

 

Wut? 0_o

 

View Postcomealong1, on 03 November 2022 - 02:41 PM, said:

When the number of comments is three times more than number of games, get booted!!. We don't even want to hear from someone with less than 1000 battles in.. But their mouth over runneth and have over 3,000 comments.. Ban the ones with drastic differences in posts & battles played.. IT'S A START!

 

This moment will come in 5 of my posts.
Okay google! How to ban myself? :(

And if no jokes, then it is too categorical.

 

 


Benefacta male locata malefacta arbitror

Marcus Tullius Cicerō


GeorgePatton #11 Posted 04 November 2022 - 04:18 AM

    газета

  • -Community Ace-
  • 2119 battles
  • 5,996
  • [FK] FK
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostXBK, on 02 November 2022 - 12:42 PM, said:

We are working on matchmaker improvements.

 

Any chance we could get a sneak peak of the work (how it is planned to operate once implemented) so we can have some input before yet another MM change drives off half of the remaining players? The pain in my comment is not directed at you personally, XBK, you've been great so far, but I would think WG management would learn to stop making changes to the game and pushing them without first consulting with the community. Since WG moved out of CIS region, they have to realize that NA is the market they need to target...

 


Cheers!
Glenn


                                                                                                                                 Click the Pictures to Visit My YouTube Channel.


gerr22 #12 Posted 04 November 2022 - 12:47 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 9310 battles
  • 973
  • [SS-G1] SS-G1
  • Member since:
    12-27-2013

holy a dev and mod in the forum there is HOPE for us guys and gals stick with it we will soon get a better game i can see in the future you know

 

not really 



qu33kKC #13 Posted 04 November 2022 - 12:47 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 20654 battles
  • 2,185
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    10-14-2017

View PostMIrall, on 03 November 2022 - 11:11 PM, said:

 

Wut? 0_o
 

 

Corvus enjoys poking the trolls, thus the trolls accuse him of the behavior that they (the trolls) are engaged in.  Therefore, having Corvus as a Mod would be the trolls worst nightmare.  Having it be an alt-account of Corvus would add to the irony, much like RAIIIIIIIIINNNNN on a wedding day. . . .

 

was joke.



gerr22 #14 Posted 04 November 2022 - 12:49 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 9310 battles
  • 973
  • [SS-G1] SS-G1
  • Member since:
    12-27-2013
i hope XBK takes notice of at least some of our thoughts is all

MIrall #15 Posted 04 November 2022 - 01:58 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Moderator
  • 6 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    05-05-2015

View Postqu33kKC, on 04 November 2022 - 12:47 PM, said:

was joke.

 

The water troll cycle in nature

 

View Postgerr22, on 04 November 2022 - 12:47 PM, said:

holy a dev and mod in the forum there is HOPE for us guys and gals stick with it we will soon get a better game i can see in the future you know

 

not really 

 

Sorry, but I (and mods at all) have no influence on the development.


Benefacta male locata malefacta arbitror

Marcus Tullius Cicerō


desert786 #16 Posted 10 November 2022 - 09:57 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 23564 battles
  • 300
  • [HVAR] HVAR
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostXBK, on 02 November 2022 - 09:42 AM, said:

Hi. No, dividing the audience into bomber-only and fighter-only queues would be detrimental to everyone.

We are working on matchmaker improvements.

no i would not. EVERY PvP class would be grateful to see the skilless boomber class removed from their Q. let them be as OP as they want. i their own boomber only game mode.


Edited by desert786, 10 November 2022 - 09:58 PM.


CorvusCorvax #17 Posted 11 November 2022 - 04:17 AM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 7627 battles
  • 9,011
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdesert786, on 10 November 2022 - 01:57 PM, said:

no i would not. EVERY PvP class would be grateful to see the skilless boomber class removed from their Q. let them be as OP as they want. i their own boomber only game mode.

LOL.

 

Never gonna happen. 

 

Guess you'll just have to learn how to play with bombers in the air.


I might not be King of the Hill, but I am the Prince of Potatoes.

qu33kKC #18 Posted 11 November 2022 - 01:20 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 20654 battles
  • 2,185
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    10-14-2017

View PostCorvusCorvax, on 11 November 2022 - 04:17 AM, said:

 

Guess you'll just have to learn how to play with bombers in the air.

 

L ~ lewd!!!







Also tagged with please, possible

4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users