From November 19 to December 20, join the in-game event to add the brand-new heavy fighter to your Hangar.
From November 19 to December 20, join the in-game event to add the brand-new heavy fighter to your Hangar.
losttwo, on 13 November 2020 - 10:40 AM, said:
WOW..what a small window of time for the events.
Guess i should quit my job to participate.
That's kind of what I was thinking. I wonder how long these missions are going to take? I pretty much only have a 2 hour window on Friday to complete phase 1 of all of these . If I can do it all on phase 2, that would make things easier.
Commodore_Sailracer, on 13 November 2020 - 10:43 AM, said:
That's kind of what I was thinking. I wonder how long these missions are going to take? I pretty much only have a 2 hour window on Friday to complete phase 1 of all of these . If I can do it all on phase 2, that would make things easier.
No love for the working man
Commodore_Sailracer, on 13 November 2020 - 06:35 PM, said:
Just as the article goes:
"The progress of personal and global missions is reset after the completion of each phase."
So you need to complete missions within a phase.
Favorites:
Heavy Fighters: P.1056, Ki-93, Bf109Z, XP-58, XP-50, P-38J, Mosquito26, Beaufighter, SE100, P-38F, Bf110E, Ki-45, Beaufighter5, Bf110B, BlenheimF, Multiroles: P-47B, Tempest, Tornado, IL-1, F4U-1, S-199, Hurricane 2, LaGG-3(4), Fighters: La-9, Yak-3RD, Vampire, Me209A, Ki-88, Mustang1A, I-210, P-51A, XP-55, A6M3 exp, XF4U-1, XF4F-3, Bf109B, 2PA, Hurricane 1A, GAA/Bombers: A-26B, Pe2M82, IL-2mod, IL-2, Me329, He111, IL-20
Either way I am looking forward to this event, we have so few big events in WoWP. Only way to put out good events is to have more events to see what works and how the community reacts.
See you in the skies pilots!
Captain_Underpants53, on 17 November 2020 - 07:08 PM, said:
Because you have not adjusted your hangar time for daylight saving
Go to < settings >
go to < general >
Edited by losttwo, 18 November 2020 - 12:51 AM.
Everyone needs to switch to UTC already. It's the 21st Century, you savages!
Favorites:
SPAD S.510 :: MiG-3 :: I-250 :: MiG-9 :: MiG-15 :: Ju 88 P :: He 100 D-1 :: LaGG-3 (34) :: Me 329
After spending several fruitless hours searching for the elusive hangar time adjustment, curse you lost2!
Edited by wylleEcoyote, 20 November 2020 - 01:09 AM.
Fair warning. My success rate at speculative guesswork is on par with my WinRate. Hit or Miss.
I start on the right track and then sometimes make a weird left turn and get lost in the weeds ...
Specialist Planes earned: Japan, USA, UK, Germany, USSR, Europe
Light Fighters: Germans? All of them. I-17, Yak-1, MiG-3, La-5
Ki-5/8/10/27/43-I/43-II, A4N, A5M, A6M1/2/3/5, Hurricane Ia, Bristol 146, Spitfire I/Ia/Vb IM, DH.100 F1,
F2A-1,FJ-1, P-23/36/36C/39N-1/40 /51A/D/H/80A/86A, XF15C/-85, XP-31/36F/55, YP-29, Hawk 75M, Model 81A-1,
MultiRole Fighters: Type 91, P-12/26/35/43, XP-44/72, P-47B/N, F11C-2, F2A/G, F4F, F4U-1/4,
Rule Britannia, Deutschland uber alles, I-5/15/16(e)(l)
Heavy Fighters: F5F, P-38 F/J, XP-50/54/58/75, F7F, P-82 B, Beaufighter/ V, All of zeGermans, Tu-1, SE 100,
Attack Aircraft: BSh-2, All of zeGermans, Wirraway
Bombers: B-17 G/29 C/32, Do 17 Z / 217 M, He 111 H2, Ju 288 C, EF 131, Pe-2 /M-82
wylleEcoyote, on 19 November 2020 - 08:37 AM, said:
Wylle, hope your not suggesting lack of balance between vehicles, because WoWP assures us there is balance. (lol)
It is very interesting that in Ships, all vehicles are now limited to what equipment can be mounted- so that if one is looking at say the German cruiser Nuremburg- the player is limited so that there is little to no difference, variation, variety, peculiarity, deviation, particularity, alteration, dissemblance, articulation, discongruity, anomaly, nonconformity, exception, idiosyncrasy, asymmetry, or digression, and all possible changes, modifications, alterations, implementations, etc., are extremely minimal.- ie. Consumalbes = 1/2 Options. That's it! That's very much more balanced.
Unlike WoWP where SPECIALIZATION renders micro changes to performance that when comparing same identical vehicles between players, there is a Humongassly Enormous Lopsided Gaping Discrepancy- which does not translate into Balance in any way shape or form, regardless of the rhetoric or semiotics put forward by the company and it's band of merry devs.
And as far as MISSIONS are concerned, can we get some normalcy on terminology. Between various titles (planes/boats/tanks) as there are - missions, directives, tasks, goals, objectives, operations, quests, assignments, undertakings, pursuits, errands, commissions, aims, orders...etc. So many ways to monetize the same bloody thing, and break it down to smaller and smaller categories, units, groupings, sorts, headings, departments, pigeon holes and on and on.
At the very least, how about a GLOSSARY of the terms being used and what WG means by those terms- since a lot of misdirection and confusion arises from interpretation.
Perhaps, even before that, fix the bugs. There is so much lag (high PING), packet Loss, when so many humans playing, again compared to other titles, that it certainly points to problems with either server or the game. Instead of playing and getting frustrated I have more fun confronting snow flakes outside. At least with snow flakes, although each is uniquely different, they are all the same, and therefore BALANCED.
Edited by Perrigrino, 19 November 2020 - 08:46 PM.
Hmmm... featuring an american aircraft without a soviet counterpart also being featured?
I must be missing something, because that would go against WG's bias.
It would be a welcome change if it were true.
In the 1960s, there was a DC comic book series following the exploits of a new squadron (somewhat like the Sgt Rock comic books).
They flew this aircraft with a slight change... 4 cannon instead of 2.
I guess this aircraft was used because its appearance was distinctive and easy to discern in 'busy' comic panels by readers
I don't remember what the comic book was called.
It didn't last 2 years.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users