Jump to content


Suggestion: have ww1, ww2, and post ww2 sections

new seciton for certain wars.

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Capt_Pepper #1 Posted 22 May 2020 - 09:39 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 6772 battles
  • 11
  • [THC-] THC-
  • Member since:
    01-14-2016

My Clan leader (General_john_Buford) and I were talking how we enjoy flying bi-planes. I'm like the dog fights of WW1. Why not have a section for WW1 and another for WW2 and another for post WW2. In WW1 section tier 1 could be Eindecter and Bristol Bullet, and tier 10 could be Fokker DR 7 and Spad. I would love to work my way up to a tri-plane and fight WW1 over again.   Same with WW2, start tier 1 and go up to tier 10 ETC..

    In WW1 the section I would know the guy in the tier 10 is not a newbe. I just think it would add entire new way to play....



crzyhawk #2 Posted 22 May 2020 - 09:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 5296 battles
  • 1,194
  • [3D_MI] 3D_MI
  • Member since:
    05-08-2015
No money for development.  We'll be lucky to see new content that fits the game we DO have let alone essentially a complete rebalance.

USA: XP31; F11C-2; YP29; F2A-1; XF4F-3; Hawk 81A1; P38F; XFL; XF4U-1; P39N; XP55; P-47B; F4U1,4; P51H  

UK: Goldfinch; Skua; Type 224; Wirraway; Bristol 146; Blenheim F; Fantome; Hurricane I; Boomerang; Venom; Spit I, Ia, XIV; Tornado; Mustang I, Ia; Seafang; Vampire |   

 | Germany: FW56; AR67; BF109B, E, E-3, F, G; Me209v4; Spit V DB605, FW190A5   | Japan: Ki5, 61, 84; A6M1, 3, 7; | 

  ROC: Hawk II; Ki43c; Tomahawk IIb; P51K | EU: B534; S199 | USSR: LaGG 3(4); P40M105; Yak7M82, 1, 1M, 3; La5


Auwingr #3 Posted 22 May 2020 - 09:47 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 8751 battles
  • 95
  • [_G_D_] _G_D_
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View Postcrzyhawk, on 22 May 2020 - 01:41 PM, said:

No money for development.  We'll be lucky to see new content that fits the game we DO have let alone essentially a complete rebalance.


You would think that with all of the new participants due to the Virus, we could expect to see some new maps or planes. I believe the last major update was back in December. C'mon Wargaming, how about throwing us a bone.


My status is "Senior Airman". Is that because I'm old? :sceptic:

Captain_Underpants53 #4 Posted 22 May 2020 - 10:03 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 29325 battles
  • 4,519
  • [A-S-S] A-S-S
  • Member since:
    04-17-2017
I like the idea but I'm with the opinion stated above by crzyhawk (even a blind squirrel and all that).  It ain't gonna happen.
MSgt, USAF, (ret)

losttwo #5 Posted 22 May 2020 - 11:39 PM

    which way do we go?

  • Community Ace
  • 8211 battles
  • 14,497
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012

View Postcrzyhawk, on 22 May 2020 - 04:41 PM, said:

No money for development.  We'll be lucky to see new content that fits the game we DO have let alone essentially a complete rebalance.


I suggest you do a little research on Wargaming .net

They have bunches and bunches of money and operate in the black



crzyhawk #6 Posted 23 May 2020 - 12:08 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 5296 battles
  • 1,194
  • [3D_MI] 3D_MI
  • Member since:
    05-08-2015

View Postlosttwo, on 22 May 2020 - 06:39 PM, said:


I suggest you do a little research on Wargaming .net

They have bunches and bunches of money and operate in the black


wargaming and world of warplanes are two different things.  This game is a waste of development dollars, there is not a player base to support it.


USA: XP31; F11C-2; YP29; F2A-1; XF4F-3; Hawk 81A1; P38F; XFL; XF4U-1; P39N; XP55; P-47B; F4U1,4; P51H  

UK: Goldfinch; Skua; Type 224; Wirraway; Bristol 146; Blenheim F; Fantome; Hurricane I; Boomerang; Venom; Spit I, Ia, XIV; Tornado; Mustang I, Ia; Seafang; Vampire |   

 | Germany: FW56; AR67; BF109B, E, E-3, F, G; Me209v4; Spit V DB605, FW190A5   | Japan: Ki5, 61, 84; A6M1, 3, 7; | 

  ROC: Hawk II; Ki43c; Tomahawk IIb; P51K | EU: B534; S199 | USSR: LaGG 3(4); P40M105; Yak7M82, 1, 1M, 3; La5


Maqor #7 Posted 23 May 2020 - 02:27 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 2997 battles
  • 212
  • [LNSTR] LNSTR
  • Member since:
    02-01-2019

View Postcrzyhawk, on 22 May 2020 - 07:08 PM, said:


wargaming and world of warplanes are two different things.  This game is a waste of development dollars, there is not a player base to support it.

Even though it's secretly has the best gameplay of any of their games.


upgrading: F-94D, P.228, J7W2

grinding: Me329, IL-20, P-51H


Jenko1957 #8 Posted 25 May 2020 - 12:13 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 8051 battles
  • 92
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    12-21-2015

View Postcrzyhawk, on 23 May 2020 - 10:08 AM, said:


wargaming and world of warplanes are two different things.  This game is a waste of development dollars, there is not a player base to support it.


They need to maintain WOWP to offer the complete product...air, sea and ground. It makes business sense to invest in the weaker product to bring it up to the level of it's sister products. This idea of letting it wither on the vine makes no sense. Developement dollars would not be wasted if they achieve the goal of a complete product. If WOT and WOWS are well populated then they should do some cross promotion to encourage some of those players to include WOWP in the wargaming experience.

 

Perhaps offering a WW1 and post WW2 experience would be the type of investment that brings the game to a wider audience. It's also time to improve the graphics.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users