Jump to content


Improve World of Warplanes

Improve

  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

LupanMortis #21 Posted 01 September 2019 - 08:00 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 331 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostBubba_Zanetti, on 01 September 2019 - 07:49 PM, said:


He’ll tell you they need to go back to 1.4.

 

 

I just want anniversaries to return that can be useful for tanks/ships because I have ZERO faith they’ll ever get this game back on any track.

 

What was so good about 1.4? Also I was hoping about moving forward instead of backwards. What was in anniversaries? What would you like to see to spice this game up? What track would you like for it to be going on? Do they not update the game very often?



Bubba_Zanetti #22 Posted 01 September 2019 - 08:08 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 4657 battles
  • 2,382
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostLupanMortis, on 01 September 2019 - 03:00 PM, said:

 

What was in anniversaries?

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/522282-why-doesnt-world-of-tanks-have-anniversary-celebrations-world-of-warplanes-is-rocking-it/page__st__40__pid__10594704#entry10594704


 

“The sad truth is that the one thing around here is that we can always rely on is broken promises”& WarMagic the Scattering- Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo █ If a company can't handle the truth based on pixelated facts then they shouldn't be in this industry to begin with. Or stop overreaching at areas where they obviously lack the resources to make a sucess (WOWP)” - ArrowZ_  As it is, this “upgrade” is totally misdirected and completely ignores all player feedback over the past few years.  How this studio continues on with the parent company is a total mystery to me.” - Bobby_Tables  The only thing that will fix this game is for the developers to right click and hit send to trash. - xPALEHORSEx  They've been around a good while and seen a lot of flak so they surely must know what they're doing by now. - Catch21  All wargaming has done in all their games across the board have been stupid and greedy ideas. They are failing as a company so hard. - Veraxu  Maybe Persha should avoid patches with the number 5 in them... - mnbv-fockewulfe  You put the bombsite behind a lock until you get specialist for your bombers? That's just stupid. - comtedumas  claiming victory by fixing your own problems isn't victory, it's low brow chicanery.- TheMadPizzler  Flying games generally don't have broad appeal, and this one has issues and the company tends to pour gasoline those issues, not fix them - _Laserguided_   “I go to RU and (rhymes with git) all over dumb Slavs to express my rage.” - Rando CA  If you want to sell someone a car, you let them take it for a test drive, you don't run them over with it. - Blast_Radius1  My quote + Your signature + Please = Thank You- Prenzlau  Feelings aren't stats, now shut up and go eat tide pods” - Noreaga  “The player online count was removed October 2017 and we don't have plans to return this number to be displayed. That is the decision of the developers team.”- blindfold  After a While it Becomes Tiresome (07.06.15)” - MALICE_AT_BIRTH  “Yes, we can have a place to report all the bugs and then watch as they all get ignored for 6 months” - Gang_Starr █ SonicPariah and blindfold might be listening to us, and sending our ideas along, but Persha sure isn't getting the message.” - CorvusCorvax  They just go on inventing new not-asked-for stuff before fixing what people clearly don't like ...”- GonerNL █ There is a difference between arcade and this roll your face on the keyboard simulator” - Fog_Heavy_Cruiser_Chokai  “The real question of the day: Is there room for one more quote in Bubba‘s signature? I certainly hope so.”- MelBrooks  They had to make some space for your signature” - Marsco  “It's the game.  And your signature is long enough to choke a horse. I thought mine was too large.”- SkyWolf_WM


Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo #23 Posted 01 September 2019 - 10:39 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 1086 battles
  • 4,604
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    01-26-2014

View PostLupanMortis, on 01 September 2019 - 02:54 PM, said:

 

I don't think its so much of that as enriching the conversation for what the possibilities are and suggesting what can be conserved. While suggesting what could be added if not improved upon. That's the thing though, without suggestions of what can be improved upon, fixed or added. Then for it to become a reality. If not, then really why should anyone stick around and invest in the game. What good is it to go through 1000's of battles if it stands still and not progress further in making the game better. Spicing it up where players want to return more often than just uninstall it and not give it another thought. If I was in WG shoes or any developer, I would want my game to succeed and have as many people enjoy it as possible. Then also wanting to keep their interest and enjoyment for as long as I could. That's being passionate about any creation. 

 

Yet, I find so far that posting such on both here and WoT has been met with no enrichment towards that goal. It's a bit bewildering... 

ok, my filters are turned off, been drinking

please just stop... jus stop

posting and acting like you have some damn insight that we should recognize

geezis

:facepalm:


if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],

you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.


losttwo #24 Posted 02 September 2019 - 12:19 AM

    which way do we go?

  • Community Ace
  • 4395 battles
  • 13,737
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012

View PostAce_BOTlistic_Cosmo, on 01 September 2019 - 05:39 PM, said:

ok, my filters are turned off, been drinking

please just stop... jus stop

posting and acting like you have some damn insight that we should recognize

geezis

:facepalm:


Keep drinking and pour me one while you are at it.

I am so sick and tied of single shot malt thinking they have any real idea's to add.

This game is far beyond the Closed testing and Open testing phase of development

to the tune of 2.0 something or other.

WG did not listen to the 30K+ gaming experience of 1000+ players and in walks the new millennial

fresh of the AA degree wagon and his Superman leotards screaming listen to me I'm special.

 

Lets finish of this bottle of Johnny Walker Blue Label my Dad left me when he passed on the 18th

Sit back and laugh.



Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo #25 Posted 02 September 2019 - 12:25 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 1086 battles
  • 4,604
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    01-26-2014

blessid that ol man

such forsight


if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],

you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.


CorvusCorvax #26 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:04 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 3981 battles
  • 4,020
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostLupanMortis, on 01 September 2019 - 08:00 PM, said:

 

What was so good about 1.4? Also I was hoping about moving forward instead of backwards. What was in anniversaries? What would you like to see to spice this game up? What track would you like for it to be going on? Do they not update the game very often?


Well, you could go post your suggestions in the correct forum.  That would be a start.  And please don't ask what that forum is - use the search function. 

 

I have a bit of bad news - your suggestions don't have much veteran player support currently.  You may want to re-evaluate your strategy of speaking first and playing later.  Get a couple of Tier X planes in your hangar, then maybe your observations would be interesting here in this forum



LupanMortis #27 Posted 02 September 2019 - 07:46 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 331 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

 

Ah, that's cool.



LupanMortis #28 Posted 02 September 2019 - 08:03 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 331 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostAce_BOTlistic_Cosmo, on 01 September 2019 - 01:51 PM, said:

now if you read what I said real carefully you'll see I never said that,

that's just first year law student inference... very cheap and self demeaning

but...

I did answer a few of your questions yet you didn't acknowledge that...

oh well, you're welcome anyway

 

I didn't see your answers in the first response. I'm sorry. Thank you, but you are stating that suggesting what might make the game better is pointless? 


Edited by LupanMortis, 02 September 2019 - 08:08 AM.


LupanMortis #29 Posted 02 September 2019 - 08:37 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 331 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

View PostCorvusCorvax, on 02 September 2019 - 06:04 AM, said:


Well, you could go post your suggestions in the correct forum.  That would be a start.  And please don't ask what that forum is - use the search function. 

 

I have a bit of bad news - your suggestions don't have much veteran player support currently.  You may want to re-evaluate your strategy of speaking first and playing later.  Get a couple of Tier X planes in your hangar, then maybe your observations would be interesting here in this forum

 

Thanks for the input. 



Captain_Underpants53 #30 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:31 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 21456 battles
  • 3,055
  • [A-S-S] A-S-S
  • Member since:
    04-17-2017

View PostLupanMortis, on 02 September 2019 - 03:37 AM, said:

 

Thanks for the input. 


Don't get too discouraged.  But a lot of us veteran players and bottom feeding forum dwellers get jaded and cynical about the value of suggestions to improve the game.  We've seen very many suggestions, some very good, but little to no change occurs.

 

But who knows?  Maybe some day somebody's good suggestion will get the attention and effort required to implement it.  We can always dream.

 

:honoring:


MSgt, USAF, (ret)

losttwo #31 Posted 02 September 2019 - 01:21 PM

    which way do we go?

  • Community Ace
  • 4395 battles
  • 13,737
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012

View PostCaptain_Underpants53, on 02 September 2019 - 04:31 AM, said:


Don't get too discouraged.  But a lot of us veteran players and bottom feeding forum dwellers get jaded and cynical about the value of suggestions to improve the game.  We've seen very many suggestions, some very good, but little to no change occurs.

 

But who knows?  Maybe some day somebody's good suggestion will get the attention and effort required to implement it.  We can always dream.

 

:honoring:

 

The only time WG has ever taken anyones suggestion seriously is when

a player suggested they all get on the bus while standing in the rain at a bus stop.

And of course that suggestion was getting rid of 3 man flights.



Tovarich123 #32 Posted 14 September 2019 - 03:34 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 70 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    01-21-2013
I spent a good deal of time and money on pre 2.0. Then along comes this 2.0 junk and ruins the game, bite me WG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LupanMortis #33 Posted 14 September 2019 - 05:54 AM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 331 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    07-15-2012

Actually, as I said in my first post. I enjoy the game but I still really think there is a need for a few of my suggestions or others to be implemented. The grind doesn't seem too bad. Having most of my nations up to T6 already. I found the crew to be a lot like the others. Don't much care for the positives and negatives on equipment. Think that could be better. Still wanting voice over commands. I think their needs to be wing man training. I also think that their shouldn't be friendly fire as more times than not. I'm firing on an enemy and either I get crossed or vice versa with a teammate that accidentally gets hit. I also think ramming might want to be tweaked a bit. Usually that ends with both aircraft in the real world to be destroyed. I think their should be more of a risk involved. More damage taken. It would be nice to have other buffs as I don't see many differences in painting. 

 

I still don't have a good grasp on medals and rankings within a battle. How is it that light fighters can still fly in high altitude in the same manner as when they are in a low altitude? It would be nice if that was established a bit better. I know the likelihood of this being read might be low. Even less to get changed in the game, but wanted to at least try to contribute.



Captain_Underpants53 #34 Posted 14 September 2019 - 06:21 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 21456 battles
  • 3,055
  • [A-S-S] A-S-S
  • Member since:
    04-17-2017

View PostLupanMortis, on 14 September 2019 - 12:54 AM, said:

Actually, as I said in my first post. I enjoy the game but I still really think there is a need for a few of my suggestions or others to be implemented. The grind doesn't seem too bad. Having most of my nations up to T6 already. I found the crew to be a lot like the others. Don't much care for the positives and negatives on equipment. Think that could be better. Still wanting voice over commands. I think their needs to be wing man training. I also think that their shouldn't be friendly fire as more times than not. I'm firing on an enemy and either I get crossed or vice versa with a teammate that accidentally gets hit. I also think ramming might want to be tweaked a bit. Usually that ends with both aircraft in the real world to be destroyed. I think their should be more of a risk involved. More damage taken. It would be nice to have other buffs as I don't see many differences in painting. 

 

I still don't have a good grasp on medals and rankings within a battle. How is it that light fighters can still fly in high altitude in the same manner as when they are in a low altitude? It would be nice if that was established a bit better. I know the likelihood of this being read might be low. Even less to get changed in the game, but wanted to at least try to contribute.


Check with farquare in FK clan.  He knows of a legal mod that will get you voice over.  Pretty good guy when he pulls his head out of his ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

:P


MSgt, USAF, (ret)





Also tagged with Improve

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users