Jump to content


Limit GA/Bombers in Flight


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

CorvusCorvax #61 Posted 29 May 2019 - 05:19 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 4243 battles
  • 4,317
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostGeorgePatton, on 22 May 2019 - 12:28 AM, said:

 

CorvusCorvax refused to put his money where his mouth is and fight me 1v1 Bf.109G vs BV P.210.

 

 

I'm sorry that you can neither read nor understand.

 

That isn't my problem, but you may want to go back and read what I wrote.  I'm not going to ask for an apology, because I know you're not big enough to do that.

 

Your premises are still not consistent, nor do they make sense.  But keep crying about it, and maybe WG will eliminate flights altogether.



Bobby_Tables #62 Posted 29 May 2019 - 06:05 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 7953 battles
  • 1,855
  • [-DOW-] -DOW-
  • Member since:
    06-16-2014

[Deleted]  

 

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/vomiting_emoji.png

 

 

 

 


Edited by Bobby_Tables, 29 May 2019 - 06:16 AM.


trikke #63 Posted 29 May 2019 - 11:40 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 3557 battles
  • 3,445
  • [R-A-W] R-A-W
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
i love XKCD       even bought a tasteful teeshirt just to support them
Spittoon says #smarterpilotswinmore

vcharng #64 Posted 08 August 2019 - 10:15 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 3740 battles
  • 859
  • Member since:
    10-25-2017

Pretty surprised to hear people talking about GA/Bombers needing limits.

Bombers are barely flyable only when they platoon up, and GAAs are... better, but never stronger than fighters.

Yes anti-ground is where players have significant advantage over bots, but they still hardly compete against fighters (LF, MR, HF).






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users