

April Statistics
#21 Posted 21 May 2019 - 12:25 PM
#22 Posted 22 May 2019 - 08:37 AM
beaver_cleaver, on 21 May 2019 - 03:25 PM, said:
This question was answered in this thread already. It's no problem to post it once again:
blindfoId, on 16 May 2019 - 12:42 PM, said:
Strictly human players stats. There's actually a note "by players" in the statistics for you to be sure

#23 Posted 22 May 2019 - 11:08 AM
700k battles! in one month! congrats, WG
but if 4 humans were in the same battle, it counts as 4 battles but i don't care that's a %@&# ton of %@&# battles!!
what do you guess is the average ca$h outlay per player, per battle? a dime? fifty cents? including low ters, where it costs almost nothing to fly
btw, BF... we would love to see the number of battles per tier and maybe not as polished and pretty, just a few lines of text, saving time for you guys?
edit: i almost forgot BF, ty for sharing this interesting info you've given us all hope!
Edited by trikke, 22 May 2019 - 11:13 AM.
#25 Posted 22 May 2019 - 04:07 PM
blindfoId, on 22 May 2019 - 03:37 AM, said:
This question was answered in this thread already. It's no problem to post it once again:
yes, but math is a funny subject
the numbers can be pushed around and
formulas can be done any number of ways...
arriving at different "answers"
I was just wondering exactly what formula was used to arrive at those numbers
that is all
spin should be left to the final cycle of the washing machine
if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],
you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.
#26 Posted 22 May 2019 - 04:12 PM
CorvusCorvax, on 20 May 2019 - 01:16 PM, said:
Well, there is an element to it that argues that it is not entirely dead. If those stats are accurate, that is.
Agreed. Glad to see those numbers which look impressive to my probably ignorant of such experience.
But the P-12?
Booze
#27 Posted 22 May 2019 - 05:16 PM
#28 Posted 22 May 2019 - 08:22 PM
Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo, on 22 May 2019 - 04:07 PM, said:
yes, but math is a funny subject
the numbers can be pushed around and
formulas can be done any number of ways...
arriving at different "answers"
I was just wondering exactly what formula was used to arrive at those numbers
that is all
spin should be left to the final cycle of the washing machine
probably through the API data.
That said, a friendly reminder that number of daily players is still hidden.
Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.
#29 Posted 22 May 2019 - 11:44 PM
Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo, on 22 May 2019 - 10:07 AM, said:
yes, but math is a funny subject
the numbers can be pushed around and
formulas can be done any number of ways...
arriving at different "answers"
I was just wondering exactly what formula was used to arrive at those numbers
that is all
spin should be left to the final cycle of the washing machine
And yet, here you are.. trying to spin it to continue your narrative of doom.,
Funny That.
#30 Posted 23 May 2019 - 12:14 AM
White_Widow18, on 22 May 2019 - 06:44 PM, said:
And yet, here you are.. trying to spin it to continue your narrative of doom.,
Funny That.
did you suffer a head injury this afternoon
I wish you well on your recovery
if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],
you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.
#31 Posted 23 May 2019 - 12:57 AM
Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo, on 22 May 2019 - 06:14 PM, said:
did you suffer a head injury this afternoon
I wish you well on your recovery
No, even with the short term memory issues I have I know the way the data is gathered has been explained ad nauseum by Blindfold. Yet you keep looking for a way to spin it to continue your narrative of doom about the game. That's ok, humans do that. Confirmation Bias is a difficult thing to overcome and when faced with anything that goes against your established knowledge it is a jarring thing. People will do anything, interpret things any way they can to complete their narrative and when they can't find a way to do that they just start sea lioning.
That's your prerogative here in the states at least. Believe what you want to believe. Doesn't have to mesh with reality, plenty of folks' beliefs don't ;)

I'm still going to tweak your chin about it ya old goat. Of all the forum trolls you're probably the only one I find interesting or amusing. If for no other reason than what you type is so often so very much nonsense and innuendo and generally lacking the venom others impart and ergo get returned to them.

*salutes* I respect a -good- forum game player in you. Others talk big about it, you actually try to work it.
#32 Posted 23 May 2019 - 01:00 AM
If anything, less people played last month compared to march.
The only way for it to have stayed the same is if matches had more people in them, which just means there was a greater density of players at certain times, not more overall.
Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.
#34 Posted 23 May 2019 - 01:20 AM
White_Widow18, on 22 May 2019 - 07:57 PM, said:
No, even with the short term memory issues I have I know the way the data is gathered has been explained ad nauseum by Blindfold. Yet you keep looking for a way to spin it to continue your narrative of doom about the game. That's ok, humans do that. Confirmation Bias is a difficult thing to overcome and when faced with anything that goes against your established knowledge it is a jarring thing. People will do anything, interpret things any way they can to complete their narrative and when they can't find a way to do that they just start sea lioning.
That's your prerogative here in the states at least. Believe what you want to believe. Doesn't have to mesh with reality, plenty of folks' beliefs don't ;)

I'm still going to tweak your chin about it ya old goat. Of all the forum trolls you're probably the only one I find interesting or amusing. If for no other reason than what you type is so often so very much nonsense and innuendo and generally lacking the venom others impart and ergo get returned to them.

*salutes* I respect a -good- forum game player in you. Others talk big about it, you actually try to work it.
damn... you're good
hehe
wrong but good
if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],
you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.
#35 Posted 23 May 2019 - 02:37 AM
Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.
#36 Posted 23 May 2019 - 06:50 AM
#37 Posted 23 May 2019 - 06:54 AM
Actually, parsing those numbers one could easily arrive at the conclusion it was roughly the same number of players, but that battles obviously lasted longer given the large increase in sectors captured, tail gun kills, etc.

Again, receipts? Proof? That -is- a direct statistic WG doesn't give, the # of unique login IDs playing in a given month and one that we can only secondary speculate on.. barring you being able to explain the -large- increase in sectors captured vs the less impressive drop in battles.... It makes more sense to me to surmise that games were more competitive.
*shrug*
#38 Posted 23 May 2019 - 07:04 AM

o7
Goodbye.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users