Jump to content


ok i not get this


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

sandtiger #1 Posted 13 April 2019 - 08:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 17392 battles
  • 1,172
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011

so ik was in a match to day where i was in may tier 4 bf 109 fighter an a

bot with and ar 193  with four hp left rammed me in a bf 109 with full health

and it kills me but lives   did this again later with 5 hp when i was f fight some thing else all way across the map i saw it come from the air base to the cc  and  then i lost track of it i was in a big fur ball  i was not losing an hp

because i was chase all the planes on the tail of other planes

yet this no health bot with 5 hp take me out just as i about to get my 15 kill for the mission

to say i mad would be an under statement

this is not the first time i seen this

or hear of this... i think your ram physics really  need an up date



Chuck_norris10 #2 Posted 13 April 2019 - 10:11 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 1214 battles
  • 6,203
  • [300SP] 300SP
  • Member since:
    03-02-2013

Parody I made years ago when rammers and other bugs ruled the day and not much has changed! 

Hope it doesn't offend anyone.

 

 


Edited by Chuck_norris10, 13 April 2019 - 10:57 PM.

 

 


 

losttwo #3 Posted 13 April 2019 - 10:30 PM

    which way do we go?

  • Community Ace
  • 1111 battles
  • 12,913
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012

When you come back as Chuck_Norris_2.0 we will know you offended some one and got perma banned.

 

I made a few ramming videos when WG changed the ramming mechanics in 1.something or other

and it really angered several people trying to learn the NEW mechanics of ramming for the win.

 

Perhaps in your given situation, as you explained it, WG has taken the HP value out of the equation.

Sounds odd but that is WG and their way of making people angry.

 

You can search WG blog for more on ramming mechanics. I think it is still in there. Hopefully they have updated to match any new information.

 

It would not surprise me one bit if contact to contact positions are evaluated for ramming.

IE front of your plane goes through wing= your engine damaged and enemy eliminated.

   

My best suggestion would be to send the video replay to support so they can research and possibly

decide to fix the ramming mechanics in game.

 

The one thing I have noticed that I do not like is that there seems to be intentional ramming by bots.

I do not mean head on or avoidable ramming, as most ramming can be avoided.

I have had several bots intentionally ram my plane from behind rather than shoot to kill.



Chuck_norris10 #4 Posted 13 April 2019 - 11:34 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 1214 battles
  • 6,203
  • [300SP] 300SP
  • Member since:
    03-02-2013
heh,I got enough warnings.

 

 


 

FlakValleyExpress #5 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:15 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 60 battles
  • 4,133
  • Member since:
    02-09-2012

View PostChuck_norris10, on 13 April 2019 - 06:34 PM, said:

heh,I got enough warnings.

 

As many as me? :hiding:

1.X WoWP veteran - Airborne Scout - Class of 1.0 - Non-Russian

Vae victis

Update 2.0 - It's not a bug, it's a feature- Let's be Professional, Fix it! - Be the gold standard for MMO warplanes. Ditch the Zero and get with a Hero WoWP - Best troll game in 2018/2019

"Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in."

 


Chuck_norris10 #6 Posted 14 April 2019 - 12:49 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 1214 battles
  • 6,203
  • [300SP] 300SP
  • Member since:
    03-02-2013

View PostFlakValleyExpress, on 14 April 2019 - 04:15 AM, said:

 

As many as me? :hiding:

 

Ya,The one WR you dont speak about.

 

 


 

sandtiger #7 Posted 15 April 2019 - 02:54 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 17392 battles
  • 1,172
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011

thank you for the info 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users