

IS THIS A JOKE ?
#1 Posted 05 October 2018 - 12:24 AM
#2 Posted 05 October 2018 - 12:28 AM

#4 Posted 05 October 2018 - 12:42 AM
Moderated by Volier_Zcit
Edited by Volier_Zcit, 09 October 2018 - 06:02 AM.

#5 Posted 05 October 2018 - 01:42 AM
PATHETIC game mode.
17 bomber wins IN A ROW. Been defender every one but 2.
WG didnt even Test this mode.. so damn obvious.
#6 Posted 05 October 2018 - 02:59 AM
#7 Posted 05 October 2018 - 03:14 AM
I have seen 5 defend wins just this morning (it's morning here), one of which I shot down 43 bombers in my Me410.
It's finally a game mode where player bombers can win, and HF weighs more than LF.
But yes, perhaps the game balance was a bit overboard.
It would be good addition beside the conquest mode and/or attrition mode, as they are both very LF centered.
Though I'm not sure if "different categories rule different modes" is indeed a good idea.
#8 Posted 05 October 2018 - 03:22 AM
Look the instructions in the left side of the screen previous to Battle.
They say (Playing with fighters):
1. Defend AA
2. Destroy enemy planes
3. Destroy bombers
I won several by killing a lot of enemy planes (similar to attrition).
Edited by El_Mulo, 05 October 2018 - 03:22 AM.
#9 Posted 05 October 2018 - 03:24 AM
El_Mulo, on 05 October 2018 - 03:22 AM, said:
Look the instructions in the left side of the screen previous to Battle.
They say (Playing with fighters):
1. Defend AA
2. Destroy enemy planes
3. Destroy bombers
I won several by killing a lot of enemy planes (similar to attrition).
That explains a lot, I was wondering why defending LFs are so interested in shooting at our GAAs...
Perhaps the best way for the defending LFs to win is to destroy the whole enemy flight after depleting their reserves.
#10 Posted 05 October 2018 - 03:25 AM
#11 Posted 05 October 2018 - 03:32 AM
StoptheViolins, on 05 October 2018 - 03:25 AM, said:
Perhaps your top scorer focused on shooting at enemy planes and wasn't able to stop the bombers?
#12 Posted 05 October 2018 - 03:53 AM
On the defending team, it seems to be all about killing the bomber flights before they can make it to the "strategic target" or whatever the heck it is. Just was on an attacking team that was defeated. Long battle and it was the most successful defense I have seen yet. The attacking team did a pretty good job of capping the Strongholds, but the defenders just chewed up the bot bombers (and mine). The 410 seems to be the meta for this mode at mid tiers. Have not tried the higher tiers as yet. Curious what is going on there (probably 1v1 as usual).
I think cannons are going to be the go-to weapon for the defenders. Sitting below a bomber and chipping away with .50 cals probably is not the best call.
#13 Posted 05 October 2018 - 04:24 AM
Actually the solution is quite simple: Fly GAAs and bombers.
If everyone does that (or fly with a flightmate in GAAs/bombers), the system will give you PVE games, and you get your auto-win.
#14 Posted 05 October 2018 - 04:25 AM
#15 Posted 05 October 2018 - 05:07 AM
Xr901, on 04 October 2018 - 10:25 PM, said:
Which is why cannons and to a possibly lesser extent rockets rule if you are defending. But even in a Light Fighter with cannons, taking out a GA can be a fairly slow process. It can work in Conquest mode because they have to take down the Garrison/Mine/Base/Whatever. In this mode all they really have to do is take out the AA. So, in your LF, against a GA, you have to avoid the tail gunner which means maneuvering, taking shots, zooming out and repositioning. That takes time and in the meantime the GA is hitting AA which is not all that hard to kill. Multiply that by the other bombers that are not part of the attack flight raining bombs down on AA and you are in a messy situation.
I would think that strong Multi-Roles that can climb, have cannons, and can carry rockets would be a better choice than a LF. Heavies seem to be the best choice because most of them have cannons, maybe carry rockets, and can quickly kill both bombers and GA. The bomber flights are not up very high, so a good heavy or even strong engined multi-role can get up to them if you retain your boost.
The biggest issue is team cohesion. On the Attacking side, it's pretty obvious what to do: Kill the AA and any planes attacking the bomber flights. Some bombers can at the very least hurt or even kill the planes attacking the bomber flights. GAs like the German line and even in a pinch some of the Soviet lines at higher tiers can tackle fighters that try to get low and kill the GAs. So the defenders have a difficult situation if players start to fixate on, say GAs and ignore the bomber flights. Best defense team I have seen yet concentrated on the bomber flights and anyone who chose to defend said flights. They just destroyed the bomber flights and sent the escorting planes back to respawn time and time again. That was a one in a million team however. Most don't seem to know what to attack when defending.
Bottom line: Strap on the big guns, artillery, and armor if you want to be a defender and kill the bomber flights and all that try to protect them. Firepower rules this mode.
Edited by Bobby_Tables, 05 October 2018 - 05:15 AM.
#16 Posted 05 October 2018 - 09:45 AM
#17 Posted 05 October 2018 - 11:08 AM
Bobby_Tables, on 05 October 2018 - 08:07 AM, said:
Which is why cannons and to a possibly lesser extent rockets rule if you are defending. But even in a Light Fighter with cannons, taking out a GA can be a fairly slow process. It can work in Conquest mode because they have to take down the Garrison/Mine/Base/Whatever. In this mode all they really have to do is take out the AA. So, in your LF, against a GA, you have to avoid the tail gunner which means maneuvering, taking shots, zooming out and repositioning. That takes time and in the meantime the GA is hitting AA which is not all that hard to kill. Multiply that by the other bombers that are not part of the attack flight raining bombs down on AA and you are in a messy situation.
I would think that strong Multi-Roles that can climb, have cannons, and can carry rockets would be a better choice than a LF. Heavies seem to be the best choice because most of them have cannons, maybe carry rockets, and can quickly kill both bombers and GA. The bomber flights are not up very high, so a good heavy or even strong engined multi-role can get up to them if you retain your boost.
The biggest issue is team cohesion. On the Attacking side, it's pretty obvious what to do: Kill the AA and any planes attacking the bomber flights. Some bombers can at the very least hurt or even kill the planes attacking the bomber flights. GAs like the German line and even in a pinch some of the Soviet lines at higher tiers can tackle fighters that try to get low and kill the GAs. So the defenders have a difficult situation if players start to fixate on, say GAs and ignore the bomber flights. Best defense team I have seen yet concentrated on the bomber flights and anyone who chose to defend said flights. They just destroyed the bomber flights and sent the escorting planes back to respawn time and time again. That was a one in a million team however. Most don't seem to know what to attack when defending.
Bottom line: Strap on the big guns, artillery, and armor if you want to be a defender and kill the bomber flights and all that try to protect them. Firepower rules this mode.
Some good tips to take into account!
Captain_Underpants53, on 05 October 2018 - 12:45 PM, said:
It might be a little bit confusing. Keep an eye on the information right in the center of the HUD - under the icon of a strategic target there's a line with numbers. It goes 10/10 in the beginning of the battle. It displays how many bombers need to be escorted. Might help a bit.
#18 Posted 05 October 2018 - 11:25 AM
haven't flown it yet... but i do love heavies and bombers and GA
i knew i was going to like BEM!
edit: and it's a good way to rip the meta out of the hands of spitfire drivers, who own Conquest mode
Edited by trikke, 05 October 2018 - 11:30 AM.
#19 Posted 05 October 2018 - 12:25 PM
#20 Posted 05 October 2018 - 04:11 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users