https://www.facebook...62740860795583/
0
Posted without comment
Started by CorvusCorvax, Aug 24 2018 04:27 AM
15 replies to this topic
#4 Posted 24 August 2018 - 02:23 PM
-
- Closed Beta Tester
- 1820 battles
-
73
-
Member since:
06-11-2012
Master Sergeant
I usually play with my dog in my lap...... :/
;)
#5 Posted 24 August 2018 - 02:26 PM
-
- Member
- 661 battles
-
3,568
-
[3NIC]
-
Member since:
12-06-2013
Captain
CorvusCorvax, on 24 August 2018 - 04:27 AM, said:
I am totally going to steal that design and build on of those.
And add a yaw axis.
Edited by mnbv_fockewulfe, 24 August 2018 - 02:42 PM.
Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.
#6 Posted 24 August 2018 - 03:01 PM
-
- Member
- 5154 battles
-
5,921
-
[OWSS]
-
Member since:
01-26-2012
Major
mnbv_fockewulfe, on 24 August 2018 - 02:26 PM, said:
I am totally going to steal that design and build on of those.
And add a yaw axis.
A three-dimensional flight simulator would be pretty much the holy grail for my man-cave. It would be super cool to play WoWP in it, but I would prefer using it with something a little more realistic. Falcon 4, or something similar.
#7 Posted 24 August 2018 - 03:27 PM
-
- Member
- 661 battles
-
3,568
-
[3NIC]
-
Member since:
12-06-2013
Captain
CorvusCorvax, on 24 August 2018 - 03:01 PM, said:
A three-dimensional flight simulator would be pretty much the holy grail for my man-cave. It would be super cool to play WoWP in it, but I would prefer using it with something a little more realistic. Falcon 4, or something similar.
Would you use VR or multiple monitors?
Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.
#8 Posted 24 August 2018 - 03:50 PM
-
- Member
- 5154 battles
-
5,921
-
[OWSS]
-
Member since:
01-26-2012
Major
mnbv_fockewulfe, on 24 August 2018 - 03:27 PM, said:
Would you use VR or multiple monitors?
VR would probably cost less money, but multiple monitors would be about as immersive as you could get it without it being a real simulator.
Heck, I would love to have VR capability in any flight sim, regardless of the motion simulation equipment.
#9 Posted 24 August 2018 - 03:52 PM
-
- Member
- 661 battles
-
3,568
-
[3NIC]
-
Member since:
12-06-2013
Captain
CorvusCorvax, on 24 August 2018 - 03:50 PM, said:
VR would probably cost less money, but multiple monitors would be about as immersive as you could get it without it being a real simulator.
Heck, I would love to have VR capability in any flight sim, regardless of the motion simulation equipment.
Full F-16 mockup.
Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.
#11 Posted 24 August 2018 - 05:58 PM
-
- Administrator
- 427 battles
-
879
-
[WGATX]
-
Member since:
05-22-2016
Community Manager
CorvusCorvax, on 24 August 2018 - 04:27 AM, said:
I feel like someone told this guy "Git Gud" and he just stared them dead in the face and said "Fine. I think I will." Then built this just to rub salt in the wound.
#12 Posted 24 August 2018 - 08:50 PM
-
- Member
- 56 battles
-
199
-
[S-S-G]
-
Member since:
01-22-2016
Senior Master Sergeant
SonicPariah, on 24 August 2018 - 05:58 PM, said:
I feel like someone told this guy "Git Gud" and he just stared them dead in the face and said "Fine. I think I will." Then built this just to rub salt in the wound.
I miss Ghostprime
#13 Posted 24 August 2018 - 08:52 PM
-
- -Community Ace-
- 1696 battles
-
5,550
-
[SCHLD]
-
Member since:
10-18-2011
газета
CorvusCorvax, on 24 August 2018 - 10:50 AM, said:
VR would probably cost less money, but multiple monitors would be about as immersive as you could get it without it being a real simulator.
Heck, I would love to have VR capability in any flight sim, regardless of the motion simulation equipment.
DCS World 2.5 - you can usually find me on 104th server if you'd like! Callsign SideSlip over there. 
I fly an F/A-18C using an Oculus Rift setup + HOTAS Warthog. It leaves a lot to be desired in terms of being able to spot people on a server without tags (104th has no tags) but in terms of flying formations, aerial refueling, etc having the VR is a really nice thing.
Cheers!
Glenn
Click the Pictures to Visit My YouTube Channel.
#14 Posted 25 August 2018 - 09:56 PM
-
- Member
- 8312 battles
-
1,224
-
[ALAS]
-
Member since:
01-26-2012
Second Lieutenant
mnbv_fockewulfe, on 24 August 2018 - 02:26 PM, said:
I am totally going to steal that design and build on of those.
And add a yaw axis.
Making room for a big enough motor and ring assembly to turn that while thing on a third axis .
Your man cave is now the size of a 2 car garage and its all for the flight sim.
Still cheaper than a plane.
Fair warning. My success rate at speculative guesswork is on par with my WinRate. Hit or Miss.
I start on the right track and then sometimes make a weird left turn and get lost in the weeds ...
Specialist Planes earned: Japan, USA, UK, Germany, USSR, Europe
Light Fighters: Ar 68/80, Bf 109 B/E/E-3/F/G, Fw 159, He 51/100 D-1/112, Ho 229, Me 209 A/ v4/ P.1092, Spit.V DB605, Ta 152
Ki-5/8/10/27/43-I/43-II, A4N, A5M, A6M1, Hurricane Ia, Bristol 146, Spitfire Vb IM, DH.100 F1, I-17, Yak-1, MiG-3
P-23/36/36C/39N-1/40, XP-31/36F/55, Hawk 75M, Model 81A-1, , P-51A, XF15C,
MultiRole Fighters: Type 91, P-12/26/35/43, XP-44, P-47B, F11C-2, F4F/U-1,
Typhoon, Ar 65, Fw 190 A-1/5/D, BV P.210/212.03, I-5/15/16(e)(l)
Heavy Fighters: P-38 F/J, XP-58, P-82 B, Beaufighter/ V, Ao 192, Fw 57, Bf 110 B/C-6/E, Me 410, Bf 109 Z, Do 335 A-1, Me 262, Tu-1, SE 100,
Attack Aircraft: BSh-2, Hs 123/129 A, Ha 137, Fw 189 C, Ju 87 G, Me 265, Me 1099 B-2
Bombers: B-17 G, Do 17 Z / 217 M, He 111 H2, Ju 288 C, Pe-2
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
