Jump to content


The World of Warplanes Wiki: Finally updating things

Wiki

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

NovaTempest #1 Posted 24 April 2018 - 07:07 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1395 battles
  • 189
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

I have been meaning to mention this for a while, but I think I have now finally done enough to note the forum-goers here.

 

I have been taking it upon myself to add a bit more information to planes over on the official WoWP wiki hosted by Wargaming, I will be continually adding information as I acquire new planes (Unless others beat me to putting in more info on them).

 

I will note I have mainly only been doing the Pros/Cons of each plane that i've gone through, this is for newer players and those trying to figure out what plane they'd specifically want to try and go for. that said, a UK page still needs to be added to that wiki.

 

Hopefully those of you newer to the game find the newly added information welcomed. While it isnt thorough, it should cover enough to help you guys make more informed decisions.

 


Edited by NovaTempest, 24 April 2018 - 07:08 PM.


Lambo805 #2 Posted 24 April 2018 - 07:50 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • -Community Ace-
  • 1570 battles
  • 201
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

:B

 

:great:


Me: "It's not bragging if you can do it!"

My tombstone: He was bragging.

mnbv_fockewulfe #3 Posted 24 April 2018 - 08:45 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 247 battles
  • 2,971
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013
btw I found the formulas for the flight physics modeling if you want that info, aka I'd be glad to write an article for the wiki about it.

Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.

 

mnbv_fockewulfe.png


 


Dru83 #4 Posted 24 April 2018 - 09:34 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 2275 battles
  • 199
  • [X3M] X3M
  • Member since:
    03-27-2016

NovaTempest said:

that said, a UK page still needs to be added to that wiki.

 

 

 

It looks like the main page of the wiki is protected from editing, so you would need to get someone from WG to take care of adding that page. The wiki seems to have been neglected for a long time. Most of the tips and advice are pre-v. 2.0. We need to work together as a community if we want this to be a resource that the newer players can actually use.

 


 

ArrowZ_ #5 Posted 25 April 2018 - 12:07 AM

    Captain

  • Open Beta Tester
  • 1043 battles
  • 3,227
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

View Postmnbv_fockewulfe, on 25 April 2018 - 06:15 AM, said:

btw I found the formulas for the flight physics modeling if you want that info, aka I'd be glad to write an article for the wiki about it.

 

Do it!!!111!!1!! 

 

 

 :trollface:


Edited by ArrowZ_, 25 April 2018 - 12:08 AM.

That Ozi Client Side Lagger

 

WOWP 2.0 Videos Playlist


Lambo805 #6 Posted 25 April 2018 - 02:11 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • -Community Ace-
  • 1570 battles
  • 201
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostArrowZ_, on 24 April 2018 - 08:07 PM, said:

 

Do it!!!111!!1!! 

 

 

 :trollface:

 

YOU AGAIN! :izmena:

 

Anyway, it'd be really cool to see those physics models...


Me: "It's not bragging if you can do it!"

My tombstone: He was bragging.

ArrowZ_ #7 Posted 25 April 2018 - 02:27 AM

    Captain

  • Open Beta Tester
  • 1043 battles
  • 3,227
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

View PostLambo805, on 25 April 2018 - 11:41 AM, said:

 

YOU AGAIN! :izmena:

 

Anyway, it'd be really cool to see those physics models...

 

 

Hehe... :hiding:


That Ozi Client Side Lagger

 

WOWP 2.0 Videos Playlist


mnbv_fockewulfe #8 Posted 25 April 2018 - 02:53 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 247 battles
  • 2,971
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

View PostLambo805, on 25 April 2018 - 02:11 AM, said:

 

YOU AGAIN! :izmena:

 

Anyway, it'd be really cool to see those physics models...

 

There is a mysterious MATH file the python code keeps referencing. My guess is the MATH stuff is handled server side so I can't actually get the models directly. I'd have to couple empirical with code but it should yield a good insight to stronk russian mathz.:bajan:

Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.

 

mnbv_fockewulfe.png


 


LMG #9 Posted 25 April 2018 - 04:19 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 1868 battles
  • 1,507
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postmnbv_fockewulfe, on 24 April 2018 - 09:53 PM, said:

There is a mysterious MATH file the python code keeps referencing. My guess is the MATH stuff is handled server side so I can't actually get the models directly. I'd have to couple empirical with code but it should yield a good insight to stronk russian mathz.:bajan:

 

I think all of WG's math stuff is handled server side. Helps keep hacking at bay


This is my IL-2 (t). There are many like it, but this one is mine. :child:

Bubba_Zanetti #10 Posted 25 April 2018 - 03:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 1325 battles
  • 1,939
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postmnbv_fockewulfe, on 24 April 2018 - 09:53 PM, said:

 

There is a mysterious MATH file the python code keeps referencing. My guess is the MATH stuff is handled server side so I can't actually get the models directly. I'd have to couple empirical with code but it should yield a good insight to stronk russian mathz.:bajan:

 


 

“The sad truth is that the one thing around here is that we can always rely on is broken promises”& WarMagic the Scattering- Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo █ If a company can't handle the truth based on pixelated facts then they shouldn't be in this industry to begin with. Or stop overreaching at areas where they obviously lack the resources to make a sucess (WOWP)” - ArrowZ_  As it is, this “upgrade” is totally misdirected and completely ignores all player feedback over the past few years.  How this studio continues on with the parent company is a total mystery to me.” - Bobby_Tables  The only thing that will fix this game is for the developers to right click and hit send to trash. - xPALEHORSEx  They've been around a good while and seen a lot of flak so they surely must know what they're doing by now. - Catch21  All wargaming has done in all their games across the board have been stupid and greedy ideas. They are failing as a company so hard. - Veraxu  Maybe Persha should avoid patches with the number 5 in them... - mnbv-fockewulfe  You put the bombsite behind a lock until you get specialist for your bombers? That's just stupid. - comtedumas  claiming victory by fixing your own problems isn't victory, it's low brow chicanery.- TheMadPizzler  Flying games generally don't have broad appeal, and this one has issues and the company tends to pour gasoline those issues, not fix them” - _Laserguided_   “I go to RU and (rhymes with git) all over dumb Slavs to express my rage.” - Rando CA  If you want to sell someone a car, you let them take it for a test drive, you don't run them over with it. - Blast_Radius1  My quote + Your signature + Please = Thank You” - Prenzlau  Feelings aren't stats, now shut up and go eat tide pods” - Noreaga  “The player online count was removed October 2017 and we don't have plans to return this number to be displayed. That is the decision of the developers team.”- blindfold  After a While it Becomes Tiresome (07.06.15)” - MALICE_AT_BIRTH  “Yes, we can have a place to report all the bugs and then watch as they all get ignored for 6 months” - Gang_Starr █ SonicPariah and blindfold might be listening to us, and sending our ideas along, but Persha sure isn't getting the message.” - CorvusCorvax


SonicPariah #11 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:12 PM

    Community Manager

  • Administrator
  • 422 battles
  • 835
  • [WGATX] WGATX
  • Member since:
    05-22-2016
Yeah, this is also on my workbook for things to update and get on track!

NovaTempest #12 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:27 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1395 battles
  • 189
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

View PostSonicPariah, on 25 April 2018 - 07:12 PM, said:

Yeah, this is also on my workbook for things to update and get on track!

 

Just get the UK page back in and we can handle 75% of the rest. :D





Also tagged with Wiki

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users