Jump to content


What WG can learn from Ships


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Wombatmetal #1 Posted 06 April 2018 - 01:47 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 1141 battles
  • 1,045
  • [A-S-S] A-S-S
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

Dear WG, this is how transparency is done. This would make a better game. Please do this

 



Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo #2 Posted 06 April 2018 - 02:54 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 1217 battles
  • 4,769
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    01-26-2014
wow... we are the ugly redheaded, abandoned, shot in the head, left for dead total crap dogs here in WoWP's

if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],

you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.


SgtSchlautter #3 Posted 06 April 2018 - 06:14 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6645 battles
  • 182
  • [HVAR] HVAR
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostAce_BOTlistic_Cosmo, on 06 April 2018 - 02:54 AM, said:

wow... we are the ugly redheaded, abandoned, shot in the head, left for dead total crap dogs here in WoWP's

 

Which is really sad because if wg really kept bugs at bay during 2.0, we might actually see a lot more players. Even with all the bugs, the community is larger and livelier than it's been in years. If only they put more effort into 2.0, this game might have actually risen in popularity


Edited by SgtSchlautter, 06 April 2018 - 06:15 AM.


crzyhawk #4 Posted 06 April 2018 - 08:44 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 3600 battles
  • 582
  • [3D_MI] 3D_MI
  • Member since:
    05-08-2015
The dev team for Ships is pretty good about this sort of thing.  I agree with the OP that the planes team could learn a lot.

Specialist A/C

USA: XP31; F11C-2; YP29; F2A-1; XF4F-3; Hawk 81-A1; XFL; XF4U-1; P39N; P-47B; F4U-1,-4ROC: Hawk II; Ki43c; Tomahawk IIb; P51K |

UK: Goldfinch; Type 224; Wirraway; Hurricane I; Boomerang; Venom; Spitfire I, Ia, XIV; Tornado; Mustang Ia; Japan: A6M2; A6M3 (exp); Ki61 |

Germany: FW56; AR67; BF109B, E-3, G; Spitfire V DB605 | USSR: LaGG 3(4); P40 M-105 |  EU: B534; S199


hoom #5 Posted 06 April 2018 - 10:30 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 10204 battles
  • 2,012
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

I wonder if some of the fps drops complained about for WoWP are due to similar issue & exacerbated as the client has got less unstable -> allowing those leaks to accumulate more between crashes...

 

Having logged in but not played any battles I'll be enabling that 3 days & using them to play WoWP :)


Edited by hoom, 06 April 2018 - 10:31 AM.

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le SerB.

FlakValleyExpress #6 Posted 06 April 2018 - 11:26 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 64 battles
  • 4,181
  • Member since:
    02-09-2012

Good news. Grenoli has responded over the FPS situation.

 

Block Quote

Grenoli # 9          Sent 04 Apr 2018 - 17:59
Ml. lieutenant
Developer
202 fights 

 

Block Quote

Panzerschlange_2_1 (04 Apr 2018 - 17:48) wrote:

Q. Award, promotion, diploma?

 

(Note: this is one of the perma banned RU veteran WoWP pilots that lost their original forum account.)

 

A. At the discretion of the head. 

 

RU WoWP forums source link

 

Good answer :great:


Edited by FlakValleyExpress, 06 April 2018 - 11:27 AM.

1.X WoWP veteran - Airborne Scout - Class of 1.0 - Non-Russian

Vae victis

Update 2.0 - It's not a bug, it's a feature- Let's be Professional, Fix it! - Be the gold standard for MMO warplanes. Ditch the Zero and get with a Hero WoWP - Best troll game in 2018/2019

"Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in."

 


nwlxn12 #7 Posted 06 April 2018 - 01:51 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1408 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-01-2012

View PostSgtSchlautter, on 06 April 2018 - 12:14 AM, said:

 

Which is really sad because if wg really kept bugs at bay during 2.0, we might actually see a lot more players. Even with all the bugs, the community is larger and livelier than it's been in years. If only they put more effort into 2.0, this game might have actually risen in popularity

 

In between events, it is just as dead as it has been.  1 VS 1 and the rest bots during prime time in tier 5 and 6 does not equate to larger and livelier.  Maybe it is just my luck with MM to get in those matches but that is what I am seeing.  I do get some 3 vs 3 at times but even that still does not equal what you are saying.

Edited by nwlxn12, 06 April 2018 - 01:52 PM.


CorvusCorvax #8 Posted 06 April 2018 - 02:20 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 4278 battles
  • 4,435
  • [OWSS] OWSS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostSgtSchlautter, on 06 April 2018 - 06:14 AM, said:

 

Which is really sad because if wg really kept bugs at bay during 2.0, we might actually see a lot more players. Even with all the bugs, the community is larger and livelier than it's been in years. If only they put more effort into 2.0, this game might have actually risen in popularity

 

During the week, it has been pretty quiet in the mid and low tiers.  I was experimenting with ADA response at low tier and noticed that it was 1 v. 1 and 2 v. 2 most often.  I don't know what's going on in the higher tiers, but a couple of mid-tier games played had 2 v. 2 for every aircraft selection I made.  Now, this is a marked improvement over the time before Westwall, when 1 v. 1 at low tier was the norm.  I would love to think that folks are playing more, because it is more fun with more humans in charge of planes, but I don't think it's really a large increase.  :(

SgtSchlautter #9 Posted 06 April 2018 - 07:57 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6645 battles
  • 182
  • [HVAR] HVAR
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostRico_CotC_, on 06 April 2018 - 02:20 PM, said:

 

During the week, it has been pretty quiet in the mid and low tiers.  I was experimenting with ADA response at low tier and noticed that it was 1 v. 1 and 2 v. 2 most often.  I don't know what's going on in the higher tiers, but a couple of mid-tier games played had 2 v. 2 for every aircraft selection I made.  Now, this is a marked improvement over the time before Westwall, when 1 v. 1 at low tier was the norm.  I would love to think that folks are playing more, because it is more fun with more humans in charge of planes, but I don't think it's really a large increase.  :(

 

During this event, there are a lot of players. Until recently, there was a lot. But I think the continuous issue of bugs is turning a lot of people off. If the bugs were gone, I think we'd see a lot more players than we are currently. During the week though, it is pretty quiet

FluffyPabu #10 Posted 06 April 2018 - 08:27 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5980 battles
  • 470
  • [JG52] JG52
  • Member since:
    07-19-2012
wish they fix this fps problem, it really puts stress on eyes.

Worland #11 Posted 06 April 2018 - 08:54 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 436 battles
  • 93
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
I imagine tanks has been stealing a lot of players for the past two weeks with the Intel mission. The Warship population has definitely suffered. With a X2 for every win this weekend, tanks will continue to be where many are at. Especially if you qualify for the 3 days of premium compensation from Warships.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users