Jump to content


Q&A on Status Report Site


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

MARS_REVENANT #1 Posted 07 December 2017 - 05:42 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 809 battles
  • 8,004
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

XIPb5vo.png

 

Source Link:  https://ritastatusre...dev-qna-part-1/

 

Spoiler

 


Edited by MARS_REVENANT, 07 December 2017 - 05:44 PM.

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 01-26-2012

 

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

 


pyantoryng #2 Posted 07 December 2017 - 05:51 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 515 battles
  • 6,911
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hawker MR...don't tell me we'll have to fight for it...AGAIN, over New Year? Japanese Army Line, B&V, and USSR Megaderp lines were all introduced this way...can't you do normal releases for a change?

 

Gold stuff will stay gold...with no explanation of having no intention of bringing silver option back...

 

Team Battles not a priority...still not enough people around...

 

No ETA for Planes anniversaries but a proposed compensation? High and dry there...No ETA on daily rebalance either.

 

Coming to Asia in 2018? Maybe yes, maybe no...



WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

The_World_Needs_A_Hero #3 Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:17 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 84 battles
  • 1,339
  • Member since:
    07-27-2013

View Postpyantoryng, on 07 December 2017 - 05:51 PM, said:

Hawker MR...don't tell me we'll have to fight for it...AGAIN, over New Year? Japanese Army Line, B&V, and USSR Megaderp lines were all introduced this way...can't you do normal releases for a change?

 

Gold stuff will stay gold...with no explanation of having no intention of bringing silver option back...

 

Team Battles not a priority...still not enough people around...

 

No ETA for Planes anniversaries but a proposed compensation? High and dry there...No ETA on daily rebalance either.

 

Coming to Asia in 2018? Maybe yes, maybe no...

 

Gold stuff SHOULD stay gold. You don't want this game to become like tanks in that aspect. If there are a few rich people out there using all sorts of gold ammo for kicks, fine. But, we don't want to see the abuse like we do in tanks where every round has a credit cost. 



LMG #4 Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:24 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 222 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

TFW no new GAA line :(

 

TFW new Flying Fortress line :great:

 

All in all, I'm looking forward for the new stuff


Edited by LMG, 07 December 2017 - 07:01 PM.

This is my IL-2 (t). There are many like it, but this one is mine. :child:

pyantoryng #5 Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:29 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 515 battles
  • 6,911
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

There's a teeny tiny problem with the Hawker line in relation to 2.0...Multiroles SUX.

 

Maybe we players can work it out...



WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

The_World_Needs_A_Hero #6 Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:32 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 84 battles
  • 1,339
  • Member since:
    07-27-2013

View Postpyantoryng, on 07 December 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

There's a teeny tiny problem with the Hawker line in relation to 2.0...Multiroles SUX.

 

Maybe we players can work it out...

 

Depends on the plane. The Seafang and BV jets don't suck. 

S4pp3REffecT #7 Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:52 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 283 battles
  • 61
  • [151RW] 151RW
  • Member since:
    10-16-2017
Anyone else here wanting a proper Zero at 8-10?
At least there's more stuff coming though?

pyantoryng #8 Posted 07 December 2017 - 07:37 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 515 battles
  • 6,911
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostS4pp3REffecT, on 07 December 2017 - 06:52 PM, said:

Anyone else here wanting a proper Zero at 8-10?
At least there's more stuff coming though?

 

Maybe A8M can make an appearance at tier 8...no further than that, for beyond is the full jet age.

WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

S4pp3REffecT #9 Posted 07 December 2017 - 08:09 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 283 battles
  • 61
  • [151RW] 151RW
  • Member since:
    10-16-2017

View Postpyantoryng, on 08 December 2017 - 05:37 AM, said:

 

Maybe A8M can make an appearance at tier 8...no further than that, for beyond is the full jet age.

 

There's plenty of made up tanks to fill gaps, I'm sure they can do the same... As the J7Ws don't feel right after the A7M...

So much so I stopped at 8 and persued the Ki line...



pyantoryng #10 Posted 07 December 2017 - 08:21 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 515 battles
  • 6,911
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostS4pp3REffecT, on 07 December 2017 - 08:09 PM, said:

 

There's plenty of made up tanks to fill gaps, I'm sure they can do the same... As the J7Ws don't feel right after the A7M...

So much so I stopped at 8 and persued the Ki line...

 

So you want them to go the WTE100 route?

WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

Destroyer_Suzukaze #11 Posted 07 December 2017 - 08:47 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 277 battles
  • 230
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

View PostS4pp3REffecT, on 07 December 2017 - 12:09 PM, said:

 

There's plenty of made up tanks to fill gaps, I'm sure they can do the same... As the J7Ws don't feel right after the A7M...

So much so I stopped at 8 and persued the Ki line...

 

This is historical. The Navy took the scraps the Army would give them. The Army controlled the government and budgets, and fighter design in the Navy peaked in 42.

 

It sux but the best fighter for the Navy was Fighter 0



Conal_Cochran #12 Posted 07 December 2017 - 09:19 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 17 battles
  • 190
  • Member since:
    10-04-2014
New modes....sooooooooooooon. 

ArrowZ_ #13 Posted 07 December 2017 - 10:54 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Open Beta Tester
  • 10 battles
  • 2,527
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013
Interesting that they are still considering putting a sea server for wowp. I know where I will go if they do. Tired of the high ping [edited]here. 

That Ozi Client Side Lagger

 


S4pp3REffecT #14 Posted 07 December 2017 - 11:08 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 283 battles
  • 61
  • [151RW] 151RW
  • Member since:
    10-16-2017

View Postpyantoryng, on 08 December 2017 - 06:21 AM, said:

 

So you want them to go the WTE100 route?

 

There are many more tanks than the WTE100 that are made up and didn't break the game. In fact more than 1/2 the game is these days.



S4pp3REffecT #15 Posted 07 December 2017 - 11:13 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 283 battles
  • 61
  • [151RW] 151RW
  • Member since:
    10-16-2017

View PostDestroyer_Suzukaze, on 08 December 2017 - 06:47 AM, said:

 

This is historical. The Navy took the scraps the Army would give them. The Army controlled the government and budgets, and fighter design in the Navy peaked in 42.

 

It sux but the best fighter for the Navy was Fighter 0

 

Historical means nothing in a WG title mate. Their games are inspired by history and where able they'll match it.

 

I could list a 101 different examples but easiest is simply year of vehicle's release.



LMG #16 Posted 07 December 2017 - 11:39 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 222 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostS4pp3REffecT, on 07 December 2017 - 06:13 PM, said:

Historical means nothing in a WG title mate. Their games are inspired by history and where able they'll match it.

 

I could list a 101 different examples but easiest is simply year of vehicle's release.

 

I'll have to agree here. I consider the current WoWP iteration as "losely based on historical facts", otherwise we wouldn't be able to see some of these experimental and prototype planes that never got to really fly (and I think the Pancake might as well be the game's mascot at this point)


This is my IL-2 (t). There are many like it, but this one is mine. :child:

hoom #17 Posted 08 December 2017 - 12:02 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 693 battles
  • 249
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Some very exciting stuff.

Some very much not.

 

Hawker line :playing:

 

Has WG abandoned the Free to Win manifesto?! :( Did they clear that with Victor Kislyi?

 

Does WG hate Italy for some reason? No Italian tanks, no planes, very low priority for ships :sceptic:

I can see & understand making full T1-10 lines will be difficult but I really don't have a problem with lines ending short of T10 & would generally prefer it over a lot of the made up stuff WG has put out over the years (note: I don't have a problem with well developed paper designs & prototypes)

 

I haven't read the thread but the idea of randomising Squall Line arrival time seems an attractive way of putting in a bit of variety. Didn't actually play the previous mode but would an instant Squall Line go some way to approximating it?

 

Balance pass is a good idea, there do seem to be some particular lemons & others that may be too strong.

 

Can someone explain what a Plane Anniversary is & why I should want it back? I've seen references but have no idea what it means in game terms :amazed:

 

I don't feel bomb equipped Fighters/Heavies need a proper gun sight, the target indicator we get seems fine to me.

 

Never seen the absent older maps so don't miss them but more maps is good :)

 

Missions rework is hopefully good, though I hope not to a WoWS style loot crates thing, I prefer the older random missions it had at launch.

 

Multiple times more players for 2.0 than in previous 3 years?! But unclear if they mean more than the average or more than the max & notably only some regions.

 

 


C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le SerB.

Einssniper #18 Posted 08 December 2017 - 12:17 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 622 battles
  • 359
  • [-WS-] -WS-
  • Member since:
    09-11-2015
I'd rather Hawker Hunter be a heavy. 

J311yfish #19 Posted 08 December 2017 - 12:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 135 battles
  • 1,045
  • [343] 343
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013
Japan tech tree project could use some dialogue, welcome to continue discussion there, especially on the point of Kikka and Ki-201 implementation ... see link in sig.  Hawker....also see sig for mock up line.

Tech tree projects:  JAPAN  /  United Kingdom  /  Sweden  /  Finland (skins/  Italy  /  France  /  Poland  /  China  /  Brazil  /  United States  //  Roadmap

Map proposals:  Panama Canal  /  Great Wall of China  /  Cliffs of Dover  //  Clan:  343 Kokutai  //  Tutorial How to ignore forum posts and signatures


BuffaloTime #20 Posted 08 December 2017 - 12:48 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 216 battles
  • 578
  • [3MNKY] 3MNKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012
If they put the Super Fortress in the tech line that will be the only thing I will be playing. After the two years it would take me to get to it. That would be awesome ( not the two years ).




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users