Jump to content


New format


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

Syfliss #1 Posted 19 October 2017 - 05:58 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 26 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    01-14-2016
I think your new format stinks... I dont like the re spawn or the whole capture and hold idea, it reminds me of world of warships.  Your original format was a much better idea.  I also dont like planes in game, 1st you cant see them and then they are rt. there... all in all go back to the original setup.

Edited by Syfliss, 19 October 2017 - 06:07 AM.


KloudRains #2 Posted 19 October 2017 - 09:14 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 775 battles
  • 85
  • [-BFS-] -BFS-
  • Member since:
    06-14-2014

View PostSyfliss, on 19 October 2017 - 05:58 AM, said:

  I also dont like planes in game, 1st you cant see them and then they are rt. there...  

For what it is worth.  This is how it is in the sky with real planes.



umpiremac #3 Posted 27 October 2017 - 10:16 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 813 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    08-30-2015
For what its worth I think I tried the old version for a total of 3 days, I like the new version!

cmholt_2007 #4 Posted 28 October 2017 - 05:41 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 551 battles
  • 6
  • [JRKS] JRKS
  • Member since:
    12-11-2014
I love the new game! I would just like to see some different areas. I know it takes time to create new landscapes but still, it would be nice. 

comtedumas #5 Posted 29 October 2017 - 11:46 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1122 battles
  • 193
  • [NIN-] NIN-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2016

View PostSyfliss, on 19 October 2017 - 05:58 AM, said:

I think your new format stinks... I dont like the re spawn or the whole capture and hold idea, it reminds me of world of warships.  Your original format was a much better idea.  I also dont like planes in game, 1st you cant see them and then they are rt. there... all in all go back to the original setup.

 

wrong topic area.  
Heard on the forum.  "1.9 was a hardcore air combat sim.  And it had a lead indicator"  HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jarnalf #6 Posted 08 November 2017 - 03:01 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 196 battles
  • 2
  • [BB-C4] BB-C4
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013
I agree it stinks. Much less like flying and more like a video game. I liked the old missions,  (damage 5 Multi role fighters or Destroy 4 AA ect. ) now ever mission is so many points.  might as well play Pac Man. On the plus side I am playing WoT and WoWS a lot more.

comtedumas #7 Posted 08 November 2017 - 08:38 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1122 battles
  • 193
  • [NIN-] NIN-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2016

View Postjarnalf, on 08 November 2017 - 03:01 AM, said:

I agree it stinks. Much less like flying and more like a video game. I liked the old missions,  (damage 5 Multi role fighters or Destroy 4 AA ect. ) now ever mission is so many points.  might as well play Pac Man. On the plus side I am playing WoT and WoWS a lot more.

 

gee, a video game plays like a video game.  How shocking.  You didn’t have a sim before, and now you have a game that is at least fun.  Enjoy.  
Heard on the forum.  "1.9 was a hardcore air combat sim.  And it had a lead indicator"  HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users