Jump to content


Wiping Stats - Wiping Forum?


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

WhineMaker #21 Posted 05 October 2017 - 01:53 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 769
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

How does one apply to be a fan boi? :unsure:


View Postlosttwo, on 12 April 2015 - 04:16 AM, said:

IF OTHERS WOULD FLY THE WAY I TELL THEM TOO.

If ONLY THEY WOULD DO AS I SAY.

 


MARS_REVENANT #22 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:05 AM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5536 battles
  • 9,462
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostClickez4Fun, on 04 October 2017 - 08:53 PM, said:

How does one apply to be a fan boi? :unsure:

 

Step 1 - Play a ton of arty.

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


Steel_bomber_ #23 Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:08 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1,519
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-28-2013
Why not wipe the game too ?
THIS PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT
BLANK
     
 
            

fogny #24 Posted 05 October 2017 - 11:49 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6 battles
  • 32
  • Member since:
    01-23-2015
For those who don't know yet..
"Welcome To The Revolution", Bolshevik  very bloody one of course, turned country upside down, done exactly 100 years ago on October 1917 in Russia.
And right now 100 years later, again ...
LOL, lets help them celebrate.


scipionmk #25 Posted 05 October 2017 - 12:07 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 587
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

This is probably my last post to this WG product.

 

Goodbye  



gerr22 #26 Posted 05 October 2017 - 12:29 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 4657 battles
  • 575
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-27-2013
clowns and South Africans will keep at it i think for a while anyway maybe some canadians and a Aussie or two maybe a spanish dude

MARS_REVENANT #27 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:03 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5536 battles
  • 9,462
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostSteel_bomber_, on 05 October 2017 - 02:08 AM, said:

Why not wipe the game too ?

 

They are.  When 2.0 is released.

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


Steel_bomber_ #28 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1,519
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-28-2013

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 05 October 2017 - 03:03 PM, said:

 

They are.  When 2.0 is released.

 

  I actually meant, wipe 2.0 too  !
THIS PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT
BLANK
     
 
            

MelBrooks #29 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 12 battles
  • 1,445
  • Member since:
    01-18-2014

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 05 October 2017 - 09:03 AM, said:

 

They are.  When 2.0 is released.

 

I agree with this completely. It makes perfect logical and business sense to reboot the title given the overall player base. What to me is really interesting is the perceived black eye WG would receive by dumping a title. They must feel the interconnectivity of the other titles and their reputation warrants this type of investment. As with WoWP since the beginning, it has never been the overall strategy, but the execution of said plan and the detail involved. Bad patches, MM, 1.5 fiasco, shaky CT testing, disregard on player feedback, etc. We could go on and on, but there is no reason to do that. No matter how sound the idea, plan, or model, implementation is the key. This game was developed poorly and incomplete from the start.  Now we see 2.0 on the CT, again, incomplete. We all know the root of the problem, and so do you. I feel somewhat insulted that you would try and convince me to play something with these same parameters again. Sorry guys, get your act together.

MARS_REVENANT #30 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:52 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5536 battles
  • 9,462
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostSteel_bomber_, on 05 October 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

 

  I actually meant, wipe 2.0 too  !

 

Maybe with 2.1

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


mullyman #31 Posted 05 October 2017 - 04:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 36 battles
  • 1,164
  • Member since:
    06-09-2014
4.0 sounds about right....
mullyman.png

K_Otic1 #32 Posted 05 October 2017 - 04:55 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 5 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 04 October 2017 - 10:18 AM, said:

 

Does anything matter?  Compared to my family, I don't care about the forum.  I'm just thinking of my fans though.

 

Must be hot there in the 70's here we don't need fans.

MARS_REVENANT #33 Posted 05 October 2017 - 05:35 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5536 battles
  • 9,462
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostCdn_Avro, on 05 October 2017 - 11:55 AM, said:

 

Must be hot there in the 70's here we don't need fans.

 

Okay.

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


Jaguardian #34 Posted 05 October 2017 - 05:38 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1 battle
  • 972
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostMelBrooks, on 05 October 2017 - 08:36 AM, said:

 

I agree with this completely. It makes perfect logical and business sense to reboot the title given the overall player base. What to me is really interesting is the perceived black eye WG would receive by dumping a title. They must feel the interconnectivity of the other titles and their reputation warrants this type of investment. As with WoWP since the beginning, it has never been the overall strategy, but the execution of said plan and the detail involved. Bad patches, MM, 1.5 fiasco, shaky CT testing, disregard on player feedback, etc. We could go on and on, but there is no reason to do that. No matter how sound the idea, plan, or model, implementation is the key. This game was developed poorly and incomplete from the start.  Now we see 2.0 on the CT, again, incomplete. We all know the root of the problem, and so do you. I feel somewhat insulted that you would try and convince me to play something with these same parameters again. Sorry guys, get your act together.

 

Not sure why this would matter to WG at all, seeing as the three titles have absolutely nothing to do with each other, other than the gold and some free XP.  I am sure that the intelligent people over in WG should be able to figure a way link them so they could provide bonuses of some sort for the users and clans that would take advantage of it.  I know, I know, WG would first need to hire some intelligent folks.  A very simple first start to this would be strongholds implemented for each title that provided specific bonuses.  Planes could get an XP bonus, ships could get a credit bonus, tanks could get a free XP bonus and clans that had people active in all three titles would earn the bonuses for the entire clan so all members could get all bonuses even if they only played one title.  Provide a mission that would require a clan to complete three different parts (one for each title) that could earn a day or three days of premium time to the members.  Something.  I am sure you guys could come up with ways to make this work.

Edited by Jaguardian, 05 October 2017 - 05:39 PM.


MARS_REVENANT #35 Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:08 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5536 battles
  • 9,462
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostMelBrooks, on 05 October 2017 - 09:36 AM, said:

 

I agree with this completely. It makes perfect logical and business sense to reboot the title given the overall player base. What to me is really interesting is the perceived black eye WG would receive by dumping a title. They must feel the interconnectivity of the other titles and their reputation warrants this type of investment. As with WoWP since the beginning, it has never been the overall strategy, but the execution of said plan and the detail involved. Bad patches, MM, 1.5 fiasco, shaky CT testing, disregard on player feedback, etc. We could go on and on, but there is no reason to do that. No matter how sound the idea, plan, or model, implementation is the key. This game was developed poorly and incomplete from the start.  Now we see 2.0 on the CT, again, incomplete. We all know the root of the problem, and so do you. I feel somewhat insulted that you would try and convince me to play something with these same parameters again. Sorry guys, get your act together.

 

View PostJaguardian, on 05 October 2017 - 12:38 PM, said:

 

Not sure why this would matter to WG at all, seeing as the three titles have absolutely nothing to do with each other, other than the gold and some free XP.  I am sure that the intelligent people over in WG should be able to figure a way link them so they could provide bonuses of some sort for the users and clans that would take advantage of it.  I know, I know, WG would first need to hire some intelligent folks.  A very simple first start to this would be strongholds implemented for each title that provided specific bonuses.  Planes could get an XP bonus, ships could get a credit bonus, tanks could get a free XP bonus and clans that had people active in all three titles would earn the bonuses for the entire clan so all members could get all bonuses even if they only played one title.  Provide a mission that would require a clan to complete three different parts (one for each title) that could earn a day or three days of premium time to the members.  Something.  I am sure you guys could come up with ways to make this work.

 

I think most people, like myself, make up their own opinions rather than relying on a reputation, or public opinion.  Which is why people stopped playing WOWP, but WOT and WOWS continue to be successful.

 

I think the bad reputation argument sailed long ago.  Instead of dropping the title WG decided to run it into the ground, I'm not sure which one is worse for reputation.  In either case it doesn't appear to have affected the company as a whole, only the WOWP title itself.


1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


WhineMaker #36 Posted 05 October 2017 - 11:09 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 769
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 04 October 2017 - 06:05 PM, said:

 

Step 1 - Play a ton of arty.

 

Much better than playing WoWP. :rolleyes:

View Postlosttwo, on 12 April 2015 - 04:16 AM, said:

IF OTHERS WOULD FLY THE WAY I TELL THEM TOO.

If ONLY THEY WOULD DO AS I SAY.

 


MARS_REVENANT #37 Posted 06 October 2017 - 12:07 AM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5536 battles
  • 9,462
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostClickez4Fun, on 05 October 2017 - 06:09 PM, said:

 

Much better than playing WoWP. :rolleyes:

 

Great observation, I dont want to blow your mind, but if you look up, you might notice the sky is blue.  Not all the time... but most of the time.

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo #38 Posted 06 October 2017 - 02:10 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 1094 battles
  • 4,616
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    01-26-2014

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 05 October 2017 - 07:07 PM, said:

 

Great observation, I dont want to blow your mind, but if you look up, you might notice the sky is blue.  Not all the time... but most of the time.

 

... but never at night

and in Hong Kong not so much from street level...


if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],

you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.


INCISION #39 Posted 06 October 2017 - 06:04 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 9 battles
  • 472
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
The game is a tax write off and chump changed and held together with two crutches, WOT and WOWS! 
 

GeorgePatton #40 Posted 08 October 2017 - 01:28 PM

    газета

  • -Community Ace-
  • 1509 battles
  • 5,410
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostGhostPrime, on 04 October 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

 

Its more of an archive of the current forums. Not all threads either, most though. There is a lot of information that has become outdated. (Even for the current Version) 

 

 

He didn't say he wasn't wiping veteran players. :trollface:

                                                                                                                                 Click the Pictures to Visit My YouTube Channel.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users