How does one apply to be a fan boi?


Wiping Stats - Wiping Forum?
#23 Posted 05 October 2017 - 07:08 AM
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
#24 Posted 05 October 2017 - 11:49 AM
"Welcome To The Revolution", Bolshevik very bloody one of course, turned country upside down, done exactly 100 years ago on October 1917 in Russia.
And right now 100 years later, again ...
LOL, lets help them celebrate.
#26 Posted 05 October 2017 - 12:29 PM

#28 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:28 PM
I actually meant, wipe 2.0 too !
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
#29 Posted 05 October 2017 - 02:36 PM
I agree with this completely. It makes perfect logical and business sense to reboot the title given the overall player base. What to me is really interesting is the perceived black eye WG would receive by dumping a title. They must feel the interconnectivity of the other titles and their reputation warrants this type of investment. As with WoWP since the beginning, it has never been the overall strategy, but the execution of said plan and the detail involved. Bad patches, MM, 1.5 fiasco, shaky CT testing, disregard on player feedback, etc. We could go on and on, but there is no reason to do that. No matter how sound the idea, plan, or model, implementation is the key. This game was developed poorly and incomplete from the start. Now we see 2.0 on the CT, again, incomplete. We all know the root of the problem, and so do you. I feel somewhat insulted that you would try and convince me to play something with these same parameters again. Sorry guys, get your act together.
#33 Posted 05 October 2017 - 05:35 PM
#34 Posted 05 October 2017 - 05:38 PM
MelBrooks, on 05 October 2017 - 08:36 AM, said:
I agree with this completely. It makes perfect logical and business sense to reboot the title given the overall player base. What to me is really interesting is the perceived black eye WG would receive by dumping a title. They must feel the interconnectivity of the other titles and their reputation warrants this type of investment. As with WoWP since the beginning, it has never been the overall strategy, but the execution of said plan and the detail involved. Bad patches, MM, 1.5 fiasco, shaky CT testing, disregard on player feedback, etc. We could go on and on, but there is no reason to do that. No matter how sound the idea, plan, or model, implementation is the key. This game was developed poorly and incomplete from the start. Now we see 2.0 on the CT, again, incomplete. We all know the root of the problem, and so do you. I feel somewhat insulted that you would try and convince me to play something with these same parameters again. Sorry guys, get your act together.
Not sure why this would matter to WG at all, seeing as the three titles have absolutely nothing to do with each other, other than the gold and some free XP. I am sure that the intelligent people over in WG should be able to figure a way link them so they could provide bonuses of some sort for the users and clans that would take advantage of it. I know, I know, WG would first need to hire some intelligent folks. A very simple first start to this would be strongholds implemented for each title that provided specific bonuses. Planes could get an XP bonus, ships could get a credit bonus, tanks could get a free XP bonus and clans that had people active in all three titles would earn the bonuses for the entire clan so all members could get all bonuses even if they only played one title. Provide a mission that would require a clan to complete three different parts (one for each title) that could earn a day or three days of premium time to the members. Something. I am sure you guys could come up with ways to make this work.
Edited by Jaguardian, 05 October 2017 - 05:39 PM.
#35 Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:08 PM
MelBrooks, on 05 October 2017 - 09:36 AM, said:
I agree with this completely. It makes perfect logical and business sense to reboot the title given the overall player base. What to me is really interesting is the perceived black eye WG would receive by dumping a title. They must feel the interconnectivity of the other titles and their reputation warrants this type of investment. As with WoWP since the beginning, it has never been the overall strategy, but the execution of said plan and the detail involved. Bad patches, MM, 1.5 fiasco, shaky CT testing, disregard on player feedback, etc. We could go on and on, but there is no reason to do that. No matter how sound the idea, plan, or model, implementation is the key. This game was developed poorly and incomplete from the start. Now we see 2.0 on the CT, again, incomplete. We all know the root of the problem, and so do you. I feel somewhat insulted that you would try and convince me to play something with these same parameters again. Sorry guys, get your act together.
Jaguardian, on 05 October 2017 - 12:38 PM, said:
Not sure why this would matter to WG at all, seeing as the three titles have absolutely nothing to do with each other, other than the gold and some free XP. I am sure that the intelligent people over in WG should be able to figure a way link them so they could provide bonuses of some sort for the users and clans that would take advantage of it. I know, I know, WG would first need to hire some intelligent folks. A very simple first start to this would be strongholds implemented for each title that provided specific bonuses. Planes could get an XP bonus, ships could get a credit bonus, tanks could get a free XP bonus and clans that had people active in all three titles would earn the bonuses for the entire clan so all members could get all bonuses even if they only played one title. Provide a mission that would require a clan to complete three different parts (one for each title) that could earn a day or three days of premium time to the members. Something. I am sure you guys could come up with ways to make this work.
I think most people, like myself, make up their own opinions rather than relying on a reputation, or public opinion. Which is why people stopped playing WOWP, but WOT and WOWS continue to be successful.
I think the bad reputation argument sailed long ago. Instead of dropping the title WG decided to run it into the ground, I'm not sure which one is worse for reputation. In either case it doesn't appear to have affected the company as a whole, only the WOWP title itself.
#37 Posted 06 October 2017 - 12:07 AM
Great observation, I dont want to blow your mind, but if you look up, you might notice the sky is blue. Not all the time... but most of the time.
#38 Posted 06 October 2017 - 02:10 AM
MARS_REVENANT, on 05 October 2017 - 07:07 PM, said:
Great observation, I dont want to blow your mind, but if you look up, you might notice the sky is blue. Not all the time... but most of the time.
... but never at night
and in Hong Kong not so much from street level...
if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],
you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.
#39 Posted 06 October 2017 - 06:04 AM


#40 Posted 08 October 2017 - 01:28 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users