Jump to content


News - RU WoWP Devs Q&A 20170810 - Cammo, Rocket Splash, and landing the aircraft

news

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

FlakValleyExpress #1 Posted 10 August 2017 - 11:09 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 64 battles
  • 4,181
  • Member since:
    02-09-2012

Some info from Grenoli the RU WoWP developer on WoWP news

 

Block Quote

Block Quote

 Grenoli # 191     Sent Aug 07, 2017 - 13:28

Foreman
Developer

Block Quote

KyzMuT4 (Aug 07, 2017 - 13:16) wrote:

Q. I repeat the question asked about six months ago.
Will there be a repeat of the event for obtaining unique camouflage as it was, if I'm not mistaken in 2014 for the fifth level? 
Last time, you answered what was possible, but nothing like that was repeated.

 

A. Greetings. At the moment, all the camouflage introduced into the game immediately fall into the in-game store and are available for purchase both for playing gold and for credits. The appearance of unique camouflage in the future is not ruled out. In particular, most likely, we will try to repeat the experience of the current marathon - we will dress in beautiful livery new premium and special aircraft. 
 
RU WoWP forum source link 

 

 

Block Quote

Grenoli # 192     Sent Aug 08, 2017 - 17:51
Foreman
Developer

Block Quote

ButcherMax (Aug 08, 2017 - 17:45) wrote:
Q. In the patch theme strategically ignored the question

 

Previous A&Q for reference

Spoiler


But I still want to know the unfolded story about missiles - why, and most importantly, how exactly they were uplifted?
And most importantly to what level are you going to be nerf?

 

A. The theme of the patch, I, alas, I read in snatches, because there are enough cases. As for the question: I answered the forum long before patchout. If there is a need, I repeat without problems: 
1. The distance to the enemy aircraft on which the missile takes place is reduced.
2. returned to the previous level the size of the inside of the splash from the missiles, that is, reduced the area in which the missiles deal 100 percent of the damage.

 

RU WoWP forum source link

 

 

 

Block Quote

Grenoli # 193     Sent Aug 08, 2017 - 17:59
Foreman
Developer

Block Quote

Kyron_ua_1 (Aug 08, 2017 - 17:55) wrote:
Q. Hello dear Grenoli!I would like to read the opinion of the team on two issues:

a) are there any plans in the future, this or HP (FVE-Hit points) the airplanes of new Nations (e.g.,Italy)?

b)probably ever in no possibility of takeoff/landing aircraft? Did you consider this idea?

Thank you for your answer.

 

A. Greetings.
1. Yes, it is planned. I'm not sure about Italy, but in general there is a desire to make a conditional "European" branch with representatives of different countries. I do not orient on the terms - it's definitely not this year.
2. Yes, there is a design for landing the aircraft. So far, only design.

 

RU WoWP forum source link

 

 

This is interesting or tries to be. Cammo is possible, but not pressing at the moment from a past event. Rocket splash has been reduced to a previous parameter, and other European trees maybe happening in the future. Could they be more vague? IMO, I think the Developers are holding back in commitments of new features due to the success of update 2.0. If this (update 2.0) improvement does not save the product, nothing is needed for these new game enhancements.


Edited by FlakValleyExpress, 10 August 2017 - 11:12 AM.

1.X WoWP veteran - Airborne Scout - Class of 1.0 - Non-Russian

Vae victis

Update 2.0 - It's not a bug, it's a feature- Let's be Professional, Fix it! - Be the gold standard for MMO warplanes. Ditch the Zero and get with a Hero WoWP - Best troll game in 2018/2019

"Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in."

 


Sassover #2 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:00 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 172 battles
  • 1,459
  • Member since:
    11-28-2013
Agreed, if 2.0 is a flop there will be no need for new camo & tech trees.

 

 


Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo #3 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 1178 battles
  • 4,735
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    01-26-2014

View Post20thCenturyLtd, on 10 August 2017 - 08:00 AM, said:

Agreed, if 2.0 is a flop there will be no need for new camo & tech trees.

 

ya... even though a megaflop would be a pretty awesome goal for WG

 

Name Unit Value
kiloFLOPS kFLOPS 103
megaFLOPS MFLOPS 106
gigaFLOPS GFLOPS 109
teraFLOPS TFLOPS 1012
petaFLOPS PFLOPS 1015
exaFLOPS EFLOPS 1018
zettaFLOPS ZFLOPS 1021
yottaFLOPS YFLOPS 1024

 


if the pilot's good, see, I mean, if he's really..sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low [he spreads his arms like wings and laughs],

you oughtta see it sometime, it's a sight. A big plane like a '52. VRROOM! There's jet exhaust, fryin' chickens in the barnyard.


MARS_REVENANT #4 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5674 battles
  • 9,469
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
LOL. takeoff and landing... what a waste of time.

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


Sassover #5 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 172 battles
  • 1,459
  • Member since:
    11-28-2013

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 10 August 2017 - 07:05 AM, said:

LOL. takeoff and landing... what a waste of time.

 

Hey, it's what the people(RU) want.

 

 


pyantoryng #6 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:32 PM

    Colonel

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 2150 battles
  • 8,434
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Just more secrecy in the works...and more unnecessary fixes.

 

...at least it's better than the UI clutter that is premium shop button in Ships...



WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

mnbv_fockewulfe #7 Posted 10 August 2017 - 03:09 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 615 battles
  • 3,484
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

hey flak, i've been reading the source link and after reading through most of the page i've come to the conclusion that HP is another way of saying 'new regeim'. also there is a lot of info you leave out of your very useful info threads. is that on purpose? i.e. it is confirmed that devs are working on ranked battles. 


Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.

 


 


FlakValleyExpress #8 Posted 10 August 2017 - 03:34 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 64 battles
  • 4,181
  • Member since:
    02-09-2012

View Postmnbv_fockewulfe, on 10 August 2017 - 10:09 AM, said:

hey flak, i've been reading the source link and after reading through most of the page i've come to the conclusion that HP is another way of saying 'new regeim'. also there is a lot of info you leave out of your very useful info threads. is that on purpose? i.e. it is confirmed that devs are working on ranked battles. 

 

I use Yandex for the translations. However some things are not quite correct all the time. I don't usually edit beyond what was given by Yandex. The HP definition could be something else in Russian slang, which Yandex would not pick up.

 

BTW, do you have a source showing the rank battles development for WoWP? I have not see anything discussed about rank battles. All I have seen for WoWP development is the new regime. BTW, is the player base RU or NA big enough for Rank Battles? I would like to hear more if so. I will keep looking for such information in the future.


Edited by FlakValleyExpress, 10 August 2017 - 03:35 PM.

1.X WoWP veteran - Airborne Scout - Class of 1.0 - Non-Russian

Vae victis

Update 2.0 - It's not a bug, it's a feature- Let's be Professional, Fix it! - Be the gold standard for MMO warplanes. Ditch the Zero and get with a Hero WoWP - Best troll game in 2018/2019

"Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in."

 


Bubba_Zanetti #9 Posted 10 August 2017 - 03:47 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 4725 battles
  • 2,396
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 10 August 2017 - 08:05 AM, said:

LOL. takeoff and landing... what a waste of time.

 

View Post20thCenturyLtd, on 10 August 2017 - 08:07 AM, said:

 

Hey, it's what the people(RU) want.

 

He only specifies landing...maybe you land, jump out of your plane, run across to a tank or ship, and then the game offloads to WOT or WOWS.  It's the new wargaming centre interface!

 

“The sad truth is that the one thing around here is that we can always rely on is broken promises”& WarMagic the Scattering- Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo █ If a company can't handle the truth based on pixelated facts then they shouldn't be in this industry to begin with. Or stop overreaching at areas where they obviously lack the resources to make a sucess (WOWP)” - ArrowZ_  As it is, this “upgrade” is totally misdirected and completely ignores all player feedback over the past few years.  How this studio continues on with the parent company is a total mystery to me.” - Bobby_Tables  The only thing that will fix this game is for the developers to right click and hit send to trash. - xPALEHORSEx  They've been around a good while and seen a lot of flak so they surely must know what they're doing by now. - Catch21  All wargaming has done in all their games across the board have been stupid and greedy ideas. They are failing as a company so hard. - Veraxu  Maybe Persha should avoid patches with the number 5 in them... - mnbv-fockewulfe  You put the bombsite behind a lock until you get specialist for your bombers? That's just stupid. - comtedumas  claiming victory by fixing your own problems isn't victory, it's low brow chicanery.- TheMadPizzler  Flying games generally don't have broad appeal, and this one has issues and the company tends to pour gasoline those issues, not fix them - _Laserguided_   “I go to RU and (rhymes with git) all over dumb Slavs to express my rage.” - Rando CA  If you want to sell someone a car, you let them take it for a test drive, you don't run them over with it. - Blast_Radius1  My quote + Your signature + Please = Thank You- Prenzlau  Feelings aren't stats, now shut up and go eat tide pods” - Noreaga  “The player online count was removed October 2017 and we don't have plans to return this number to be displayed. That is the decision of the developers team.”- blindfold  After a While it Becomes Tiresome (07.06.15)” - MALICE_AT_BIRTH  “Yes, we can have a place to report all the bugs and then watch as they all get ignored for 6 months” - Gang_Starr █ SonicPariah and blindfold might be listening to us, and sending our ideas along, but Persha sure isn't getting the message.” - CorvusCorvax  They just go on inventing new not-asked-for stuff before fixing what people clearly don't like ...”- GonerNL █ There is a difference between arcade and this roll your face on the keyboard simulator” - Fog_Heavy_Cruiser_Chokai  “The real question of the day: Is there room for one more quote in Bubba‘s signature? I certainly hope so.”- MelBrooks  They had to make some space for your signature” - Marsco  “It's the game.  And your signature is long enough to choke a horse. I thought mine was too large.”- SkyWolf_WM


MARS_REVENANT #10 Posted 10 August 2017 - 04:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5674 battles
  • 9,469
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostBubba_Zanetti, on 10 August 2017 - 10:47 AM, said:

 

 

He only specifies landing...maybe you land, jump out of your plane, run across to a tank or ship, and then the game offloads to WOT or WOWS.  It's the new wargaming centre interface!

 

Imagine having to dock the ships...

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


TeamTerrible #11 Posted 10 August 2017 - 04:16 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 230 battles
  • 2,137
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

All I know is they better place some form of noob protection for any sorry sap trying to refuel

 

I love bombs n rockets (hint, hint)

 

 


 

 

         


Bubba_Zanetti #12 Posted 10 August 2017 - 04:24 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 4725 battles
  • 2,396
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 10 August 2017 - 11:13 AM, said:

 

Imagine having to dock the ships...

 

The good news I suppose,  some time off in the not too distant future,  is that Wargaming will be used as a case study in game development business courses on what not to do.

 

“The sad truth is that the one thing around here is that we can always rely on is broken promises”& WarMagic the Scattering- Ace_BOTlistic_Cosmo █ If a company can't handle the truth based on pixelated facts then they shouldn't be in this industry to begin with. Or stop overreaching at areas where they obviously lack the resources to make a sucess (WOWP)” - ArrowZ_  As it is, this “upgrade” is totally misdirected and completely ignores all player feedback over the past few years.  How this studio continues on with the parent company is a total mystery to me.” - Bobby_Tables  The only thing that will fix this game is for the developers to right click and hit send to trash. - xPALEHORSEx  They've been around a good while and seen a lot of flak so they surely must know what they're doing by now. - Catch21  All wargaming has done in all their games across the board have been stupid and greedy ideas. They are failing as a company so hard. - Veraxu  Maybe Persha should avoid patches with the number 5 in them... - mnbv-fockewulfe  You put the bombsite behind a lock until you get specialist for your bombers? That's just stupid. - comtedumas  claiming victory by fixing your own problems isn't victory, it's low brow chicanery.- TheMadPizzler  Flying games generally don't have broad appeal, and this one has issues and the company tends to pour gasoline those issues, not fix them - _Laserguided_   “I go to RU and (rhymes with git) all over dumb Slavs to express my rage.” - Rando CA  If you want to sell someone a car, you let them take it for a test drive, you don't run them over with it. - Blast_Radius1  My quote + Your signature + Please = Thank You- Prenzlau  Feelings aren't stats, now shut up and go eat tide pods” - Noreaga  “The player online count was removed October 2017 and we don't have plans to return this number to be displayed. That is the decision of the developers team.”- blindfold  After a While it Becomes Tiresome (07.06.15)” - MALICE_AT_BIRTH  “Yes, we can have a place to report all the bugs and then watch as they all get ignored for 6 months” - Gang_Starr █ SonicPariah and blindfold might be listening to us, and sending our ideas along, but Persha sure isn't getting the message.” - CorvusCorvax  They just go on inventing new not-asked-for stuff before fixing what people clearly don't like ...”- GonerNL █ There is a difference between arcade and this roll your face on the keyboard simulator” - Fog_Heavy_Cruiser_Chokai  “The real question of the day: Is there room for one more quote in Bubba‘s signature? I certainly hope so.”- MelBrooks  They had to make some space for your signature” - Marsco  “It's the game.  And your signature is long enough to choke a horse. I thought mine was too large.”- SkyWolf_WM


TeamTerrible #13 Posted 10 August 2017 - 04:39 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 230 battles
  • 2,137
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

View PostBubba_Zanetti, on 10 August 2017 - 11:24 AM, said:

 

The good news I suppose,  some time off in the not too distant future,  is that Wargaming will be used as a case study in game development business courses on what not to do.

 

we teach that at our school :playing:

 

 

         


mnbv_fockewulfe #14 Posted 10 August 2017 - 04:44 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 615 battles
  • 3,484
  • [3NIC] 3NIC
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013

View PostFlakValleyExpress, on 10 August 2017 - 03:34 PM, said:

 

I use Yandex for the translations. However some things are not quite correct all the time. I don't usually edit beyond what was given by Yandex. The HP definition could be something else in Russian slang, which Yandex would not pick up.

 

BTW, do you have a source showing the rank battles development for WoWP? I have not see anything discussed about rank battles. All I have seen for WoWP development is the new regime. BTW, is the player base RU or NA big enough for Rank Battles? I would like to hear more if so. I will keep looking for such information in the future.

 

I used a translate plugin on chrome to read the page. I'd find the quote for you but I'm on a tablet that's pretending to be a laptop and trying to do it with the forum's finicky system just wouldn't work.

I believe it was in a post from late june.

In this post

http://forum.worldof...96#entry2584296


Edited by mnbv_fockewulfe, 10 August 2017 - 04:47 PM.

Be sure to check your logic privileges before posting on the forum.

 


 


RedSpartacus #15 Posted 10 August 2017 - 05:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1,521
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

View Post20thCenturyLtd, on 10 August 2017 - 09:00 AM, said:

Agreed, if 2.0 is a flop there will be no need for new camo & tech trees.

 

Even if you have to wait 10 minutes for one battle only to see planes jerking around and losing connection every second battle and have difficulties to make it back into the hangar after having lost all your contacts - I bet there will be 300 players around.
  RUN WITH THE PACK

GeorgePatton #16 Posted 10 August 2017 - 07:02 PM

    газета

  • -Community Ace-
  • 1602 battles
  • 5,422
  • [SCHLD] SCHLD
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

Landing has been 'in the works' for several years now... The original plan was to have it be like a lottery of sorts... You land your plane after the battle and if successful you get more credits and XP. Would be pretty funny to see the rage if you lost credits and XP for a crash. :playing:

 

 

Cheers!
Glenn


                                                                                                                                 Click the Pictures to Visit My YouTube Channel.


TeamTerrible #17 Posted 10 August 2017 - 07:28 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 230 battles
  • 2,137
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

View PostGeorgePatton, on 10 August 2017 - 02:02 PM, said:

Landing has been 'in the works' for several years now... The original plan was to have it be like a lottery of sorts... You land your plane after the battle and if successful you get more credits and XP. Would be pretty funny to see the rage if you lost credits and XP for a crash. :playing:

 

 

Cheers!
Glenn

 

​Yes please land your craft

 

TT will love you


 

 

         


GhostPrime #18 Posted 10 August 2017 - 10:56 PM

    Community Specialist

  • Member
  • 64 battles
  • 2,278
  • [WGA-B] WGA-B
  • Member since:
    04-22-2013

View PostGeorgePatton, on 10 August 2017 - 11:02 AM, said:

Landing has been 'in the works' for several years now... The original plan was to have it be like a lottery of sorts... You land your plane after the battle and if successful you get more credits and XP. Would be pretty funny to see the rage if you lost credits and XP for a crash. :playing:

 

 

Cheers!
Glenn

 

While it would be cool to land, I don't think it would be practical. You never know what the future may hold though. 


Please read the WOWP Game and Forum rules.
Forum Rules - Game Rules - EULA - TOS
Find us on Facebook!


GeorgePatton #19 Posted 10 August 2017 - 11:38 PM

    газета

  • -Community Ace-
  • 1602 battles
  • 5,422
  • [SCHLD] SCHLD
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostGhostPrime, on 10 August 2017 - 05:56 PM, said:

While it would be cool to land, I don't think it would be practical. You never know what the future may hold though. 

 

Yeah, I was against the whole landing thing during the Alpha/Beta days. Would be a cool test of skill, but otherwise just detracts from the game, unless they do the credit/XP boost thing. Then there's always the problem of trying to get random players to actually fly traffic patterns so nobody gets wrecked... I think I'd rather not have to worry about it! haha

 

 

Cheers!
Glenn


                                                                                                                                 Click the Pictures to Visit My YouTube Channel.






Also tagged with news

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users