Jump to content


News - RU WoWP update 1.9.9.2 tomorrow

update La-9RD Ki-94-I

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

FlakValleyExpress #1 Posted 25 April 2017 - 11:42 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 64 battles
  • 4,187
  • Member since:
    02-09-2012

I found this on the RU WoWP portal

 

Block Quote

The pilots!

On April 26, from 3:30 to 5:30 (MSK), the game server will be unavailable due to the release of the 1.9.9.2 client-server update (the SD version is 29.5 MB, the HD version is 21.9 MB).

 

Description of the update
===
In the update 1.9.9.2 in the game will be added two new gift planes of the VII level. The Soviet fighter LaVochkin La-9RD combines a piston and a pair of jet engines under the wings, which significantly increases the speed and altitude characteristics of the machine and allows it to play it more aggressively than on conventional fighters of the Lavochkin family. The Japanese heavy fighter Tachikawa Ki-94-I is a typical representative of Japan's unique aircraft building school. Tandem motors located in the front and rear parts of the fuselage immediately attract attention, and the battery of large-caliber guns make the Ki-94-I extremely dangerous for fragile fighters and for surviving assault planes.

 

New aircraft
===
Added gift airplanes:

Lavochkin La-9RD - USSR, fighter, VII level;
Tachikawa Ki-94-I - Japan, heavy fighter VII level.


Error correction
===
Fixed the display of the texture of German helmets on Japanese pilots of the VII-X planes.
Fixed a bug with displaying the pilot of the XFL-1.
Fixed a bug due to which in some cases it was impossible to demobilize the crew of the aircraft.

 

RU WoWP portal source link
 

We are getting closer to that magical 2.0 number for update releases :trollface: :great: I thought I would let you guys know. We shall see if this comes our way later this week.


1.X WoWP veteran - Airborne Scout - Class of 1.0 - Non-Russian

Vae victis

Update 2.0 - It's not a bug, it's a feature- Let's be Professional, Fix it! - Be the gold standard for MMO warplanes. Ditch the Zero and get with a Hero WoWP - Best troll game in 2018/2019

"Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in."

 


MARS_REVENANT #2 Posted 25 April 2017 - 11:54 AM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5742 battles
  • 9,516
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
More planes is always good news! :great:

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


RedSpartacus #3 Posted 25 April 2017 - 12:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1,521
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

View PostMARS_REVENANT, on 25 April 2017 - 07:54 AM, said:

More planes is always good news! :great:

 

Currently I can choose between 157 planes in my hangar but when I drop into a battle I see the same 4 or 5 maps over and over again. One or two planes more cannot change this monotony. Are there new maps in version 2.0 ?
  RUN WITH THE PACK

x_WARHOG_x #4 Posted 25 April 2017 - 02:48 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 2 battles
  • 646
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    12-07-2013

View PostRedSpartacus, on 25 April 2017 - 07:47 AM, said:

 

Currently I can choose between 157 planes in my hangar but when I drop into a battle I see the same 4 or 5 maps over and over again. One or two planes more cannot change this monotony. Are there new maps in version 2.0 ?

 

True and although more planes are always good more maps would be good too or at least make it more random because i hardly ever see asian border and canyon which is a great map but I think I may have seen it once in the last 6-8 months thats it once and while were on maps how about bringing back the old national park map just rename it or something it was an awesome map.

Sneaking up on your six.....................


Jaguardian #5 Posted 25 April 2017 - 02:53 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 528 battles
  • 995
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Don't really understand the new map interest.  I guess I could see it if you fly GA a lot.  My opinion is GA is mostly useless in the current game mode though.  Also in the current game mode, the team that gains the altitude advantage "usually" wins.  That being said, at altitude is the same for every map new and old, unless you count the different cloud formations.

pyantoryng #6 Posted 25 April 2017 - 03:05 PM

    Colonel

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 3205 battles
  • 8,602
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Remember the ramjet La-9 a long, long time ago, anyone?

 

Next! Bf 109 with their gondolas back! :izmena:



WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

Rosebud #7 Posted 25 April 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20 battles
  • 1,039
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

View PostJaguardian, on 25 April 2017 - 09:53 AM, said:

Don't really understand the new map interest.  I guess I could see it if you fly GA a lot.  My opinion is GA is mostly useless in the current game mode though.  Also in the current game mode, the team that gains the altitude advantage "usually" wins.  That being said, at altitude is the same for every map new and old, unless you count the different cloud formations.

 

Your point is absolutely valid, the majority of battles are won from the top down. It would be nice however to see some additional battlefields. If for no other reason than the knowledge that they are still working on the game. What's it been...two years?


 


pyantoryng #8 Posted 25 April 2017 - 09:42 PM

    Colonel

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 3205 battles
  • 8,602
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostRosebud, on 25 April 2017 - 09:40 PM, said:

 

Your point is absolutely valid, the majority of battles are won from the top down. It would be nice however to see some additional battlefields. If for no other reason than the knowledge that they are still working on the game. What's it been...two years?

 

I think it's three...perhaps even four...

WoWP makes a great jousting game...especially with the 262 and people busy in furballs...
I am deaf, silent, and fly with unrealistic controls. Do not count on me to carry - my back's already broken from overweight.

Florida_Man_ #9 Posted 25 April 2017 - 10:05 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 99 battles
  • 698
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    11-25-2012
If not fixing the glaring bugs or end game content, they could at least release new maps every 3 months.  Jeesh. :unsure:

*   MAKE WOWP GREAT AGAIN :honoring:   *


Vanize #10 Posted 26 April 2017 - 06:31 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 577
  • Member since:
    05-21-2014

View PostFlakValleyExpress, on 25 April 2017 - 05:42 AM, said:

We are getting closer to that magical 2.0 number for update releases :trollface: :great: I thought I would let you guys know. We shall see if this comes our way later this week.

 

and yet again i feel compelled to point out: 1.10 comes after 1.9.

 

2.0 does not automatically come after 1.9 in any way shape or form in any part of the software industry (it might, but only purely by coincidence)

 

1.11 comes after 1.10, etc.

 

2.0 could come after 1.6 (but it didn't for WoWP), 1.9.77658546.2 or after 1.567.54.

 

we are no closer to 2.0 than we have ever been at any other release number.

 


Edited by Vanize, 26 April 2017 - 06:34 PM.


Jaguardian #11 Posted 26 April 2017 - 07:43 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 528 battles
  • 995
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostVanize, on 26 April 2017 - 12:31 PM, said:

 

and yet again i feel compelled to point out: 1.10 comes after 1.9.

 

2.0 does not automatically come after 1.9 in any way shape or form in any part of the software industry (it might, but only purely by coincidence)

 

1.11 comes after 1.10, etc.

 

2.0 could come after 1.6 (but it didn't for WoWP), 1.9.77658546.2 or after 1.567.54.

 

we are no closer to 2.0 than we have ever been at any other release number.

 

 

Every day brings us one day closer to 2.0.  Just saying.

MARS_REVENANT #12 Posted 26 April 2017 - 08:15 PM

    Colonel

  • Community Ace
  • 5742 battles
  • 9,516
  • [WG-CA] WG-CA
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostJaguardian, on 26 April 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

 

Every day brings us one day closer to 2.0.  Just saying.

 

I'm not sure you can get closer to never.... it's the same as infinity isn't it?

1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 11-03-2014

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

TWITCH  |  YOUTUBE  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER


BB3_Oregon_Steel #13 Posted 27 April 2017 - 01:13 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1682 battles
  • 706
  • [A-S-S] A-S-S
  • Member since:
    10-26-2015
Well new maps would be nice.  I just encountered Fortress the other day and spent the first part of the game flying around and looking at stuff before I got down to business.  

"Don't mess with me because I can squish you like a bug, that is If I should decide to notice your existence in the first place".  

 

Yes, it's haughty and its arrogant but you're a battleship with 16 inch guns and Britannia Rules the Waves.  Maybe a bit of arrogance in this case is appropriate.  





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users