Jump to content


Information regarding the Spam bots


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

tahee59 #41 Posted 23 September 2016 - 01:43 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 1,763
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    07-31-2012
soon LMF AO

Elias_Sims #42 Posted 23 September 2016 - 02:12 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 26
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    06-07-2016

View Posttahee59, on 24 June 2016 - 08:52 AM, said:

soon

 



Noreaga #43 Posted 23 September 2016 - 04:06 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 2,875
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    03-05-2012

aww never mind i ve link the wrong meme 3 times, karma is telling me something.

 

 

 


Edited by Noreaga, 23 September 2016 - 04:07 PM.

Nimis obnoxii curare


DInk_Spinkley #44 Posted 25 September 2016 - 11:54 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 588
  • [-BFS-] -BFS-
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015
right after they fix the looping when you try loading the game. They'll get right on it.
RIP World of Warplanes

Bear_82 #45 Posted 01 October 2016 - 11:56 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 28 battles
  • 681
  • [GWG] GWG
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
today's spam was posted ~3.5 hours ago, only 3 posts this time, reported by me now, we'll see how long it takes to get removed

Bear_82 #46 Posted 01 October 2016 - 03:12 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 28 battles
  • 681
  • [GWG] GWG
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Let's see:

- 7 hours since today's spam appeared

- 3 hours since I reported the spam, others may certainly have done so before I did

- 45 minutes since an admin was observed logged in to the forums

 

- spam is still here; anyone surprised?



BrushWolf #47 Posted 02 October 2016 - 04:26 PM

    Major

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 52 battles
  • 5,879
  • [GWG] GWG
  • Member since:
    06-11-2012

View PostBear_82, on 01 October 2016 - 10:12 AM, said:

Let's see:

- 7 hours since today's spam appeared

- 3 hours since I reported the spam, others may certainly have done so before I did

- 45 minutes since an admin was observed logged in to the forums

 

- spam is still here; anyone surprised?

 

I have remarked on the extremely slow speed that this spam is removed from this forum many times in the past. The spammer is gone from the WoT forum in minutes and a few more on the WoWS forum but they leave it up here for a ridiculous amount of time.

I used to have a handle on life until it broke off.

                             

 

“The church is near but the road is icy, the tavern is far away but I will walk carefully”

Russian Proverb

 


Lucky_Breeze #48 Posted 02 October 2016 - 05:55 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 670 battles
  • 155
  • [SF] SF
  • Member since:
    03-07-2014
has anyone clicked on this spam crap, i never have am scared i might get a virus or something. Maybe they try to hack your account if u click on them i dont know.

Bear_82 #49 Posted 01 November 2016 - 09:57 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 28 battles
  • 681
  • [GWG] GWG
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

well, it's been a month, he's at it again today

 

how long will it take someone to act on the reported posts?



TeamTerrible #50 Posted 01 November 2016 - 10:48 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 4 battles
  • 2,137
  • [S-S-G] S-S-G
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

Today was awesome, the forum spam was removed in record time!!

 

Thanks WG!!  :amazed:


 

 

         


Bear_82 #51 Posted 18 November 2016 - 02:47 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 28 battles
  • 681
  • [GWG] GWG
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostTeamTerrible, on 01 November 2016 - 03:48 AM, said:

Today was awesome, the forum spam was removed in record time!!

 

Thanks WG!!  :amazed:

 

That day was an anomaly

 

5 1/2 hours since spam showed up today, 4 1/2 hours since I reported it, and it's still here



MARS_REVENANT #52 Posted 18 November 2016 - 06:33 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 809 battles
  • 7,896
  • [SICK] SICK
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Oh No!!! SPYaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamS!!!

 

Spoiler

 


1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 01-26-2012

 

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

 


Claudio67 #53 Posted 18 November 2016 - 10:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Open Beta Tester
  • 28 battles
  • 1,498
  • Member since:
    08-03-2013

What about forbid certain words in topic titles on new posts like #ICQ CVV or whatever the spammer uses?

Or limit the amount of new posts that somebody can create in a day (5 should be enough, maybe even less)?

Too crazy ask for it?



MARS_REVENANT #54 Posted 18 November 2016 - 10:16 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 809 battles
  • 7,896
  • [SICK] SICK
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostClaudio67, on 18 November 2016 - 05:13 PM, said:

What about forbid certain words in topic titles on new posts like #ICQ CVV or whatever the spammer uses?

Or limit the amount of new posts that somebody can create in a day (5 should be enough, maybe even less)?

Too crazy ask for it?

 

Limit my posts!?!??! What are you? Crazy!?!?!  This is AMERICA!!!


1.9.x Forum Stats: Colonel; Member; 34638 battles; 7,526 message_img.pngMember since: 01-26-2012

 

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

 


Claudio67 #55 Posted 18 November 2016 - 10:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Open Beta Tester
  • 28 battles
  • 1,498
  • Member since:
    08-03-2013
Not posts, sorry, I mean new topics. And the word ban would involve the freedom of speech too, so I guess we have to live with that. Or enter the forums after 3PM when the cleaning crew wake up.

Bear_82 #56 Posted 24 November 2016 - 12:00 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 28 battles
  • 681
  • [GWG] GWG
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
with this morning's invasion, it appears WGNA has finally taken steps to limit the spam to New Players




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users