Jump to content


Clantastrophy Logistics VOTE #1

league tournament

  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

Poll: LOGISTICS (27 members have cast votes)

how many battles should happen each week

  1. 3 (6 votes [22.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

  2. 4 (8 votes [29.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.63%

  3. 5 (7 votes [25.93%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.93%

  4. 6 (6 votes [22.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

what days of the week works best for your clan - TWO CHOICES

  1. Sunday (7 votes [13.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.73%

  2. Monday (2 votes [3.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.92%

  3. Tuesday (4 votes [7.84%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.84%

  4. Wednesday (4 votes [7.84%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.84%

  5. Thuhrsday (10 votes [19.61%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.61%

  6. Friday (12 votes [23.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.53%

  7. Saturday (12 votes [23.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.53%

start time for battles

  1. 8:00pm Eastern (5 votes [18.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.52%

  2. 8:30pm Eastern (6 votes [22.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

  3. 9:00pm Eastern (6 votes [22.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

  4. 9:30pm Eastern (10 votes [37.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.04%

  5. other - Please specify - Post in thread (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

team sizes - minimum

  1. 5 (4 votes [14.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.81%

  2. 6 (3 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

  3. 7 (13 votes [48.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 48.15%

  4. 8 (7 votes [25.93%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.93%

  5. other - explain in thread (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Allow up to 15 players or keep it to the minimum only

  1. yes allow up to 15 if evenly matched and both clans have the players on (25 votes [92.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 92.59%

  2. no - keep it to a minimum team - set number only (2 votes [7.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.41%

Maximum tier your clan can compete with

  1. 6 (2 votes [7.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.41%

  2. 7 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 8 (8 votes [29.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.63%

  4. 9 (2 votes [7.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.41%

  5. 10 (15 votes [55.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 55.56%

allow variable schedule (like current league) or only set time for battles

  1. allow rescheduling for flexibility like the current league (20 votes [74.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 74.07%

  2. Set schedule. Be there on time or you lose. (7 votes [25.93%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.93%

Tie break each week or only at the end

  1. each week there needs to be a clear winner (14 votes [53.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.85%

  2. tally points as-is and do tie-breaker at season end only (12 votes [46.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.15%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

PostTraumatic #1 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:04 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

In order to make the next event go more smoothly, I would like some feedback.  We have seen issues in certain areas of this event and since this is the first-run of this League i expected to make changes for the better for the next event in order to improve the overall enjoyment of the League-Play.

 

So please answer the above questions and this will help me to make the next event accommodate all the Clans involved.  

 

Also feel free to discuss the logistics issues in this thread.


Edited by PostTraumatic, 29 April 2016 - 07:33 PM.


MARS_REVENANT #2 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:09 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 34281 battles
  • 7,328
  • [SICK] SICK
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

:ohmy:


Edited by MARS_REVENANT, 21 October 2016 - 04:08 AM.

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

 


PostTraumatic #3 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:16 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

The minimum referred to is the minimum number that has to be matched from question #4 that asks for the minimum number to be used per team.  i.e.team sizes - minimum

 

Currently we have a minimum of 7 to be matched with the option of up to 15 if matched equally by both teams.  Below the minimum of 7 teams are not obligated to match player to player.  

 

So the question is fine.


Edited by PostTraumatic, 29 April 2016 - 07:19 PM.


Bobby_Tables #4 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:26 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 24126 battles
  • 612
  • Member since:
    06-16-2014

Block Quote

 Allow up to 15 players or keep it to the minimum only

 

It's a double question.  Am I saying Yes to "Allow up to 15 players?" or am I saying Yes to "keep it to the minimum only".  That's why I stopped answering the survey, I did not know to which statement I was saying "yes" or "no".  



PostTraumatic #5 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:30 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
ohhh, now I see.  i added more description to the answer for that question.  looks like there was a dangling participle... 

Edited by PostTraumatic, 29 April 2016 - 07:36 PM.


MARS_REVENANT #6 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:36 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 34281 battles
  • 7,328
  • [SICK] SICK
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
 
:unsure:

 

 


Edited by MARS_REVENANT, 21 October 2016 - 04:08 AM.

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

 


MARS_REVENANT #7 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:38 PM

    Major

  • Member
  • 34281 battles
  • 7,328
  • [SICK] SICK
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

:facepalm:


Edited by MARS_REVENANT, 21 October 2016 - 04:08 AM.

I never lose; either I win or I learn.

 


PostTraumatic #8 Posted 29 April 2016 - 07:45 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

yes, that is true for a couple of the questions really.  Days of the week are also effected by this dynamic as well.  It is to give me some measure though.  I most likely will keep the top tier for the matches to the minimum of what clans can bring so that more can participate.  I was expecting to see that everyone can bring at least up to tier 8 so far so that is on par with the current league.  

 

I will most likely leave the variability and flexibility from the previous league that worked and change the stuff that did not work well for all such as the start times.  I did not take into full account when writing the last rule-set the time restraints for west coast players coming home from work.  this was an issue for a few clans in this first-attempt at the league play.

 

Default battle time will most likely be at a later time than this current league.  Also, I will do a better job of describing the default schedule for the next rendition


Edited by PostTraumatic, 29 April 2016 - 07:48 PM.


PostTraumatic #9 Posted 29 April 2016 - 08:34 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostTHEMARCO1979, on 29 April 2016 - 02:36 PM, said:

 

If I answer 3 does than mean 1 battler per night for 3 nights per week?  Or does that mean 3 battles 1 night per week. Given the next question

 

 

Asking to select 2, does that mean there will be 2 battle nights? or are you asking for top two choices in order to select the best single battle night per week?

 

 

The battles will all happen on one night per week

 

I asked for 2 responses so players could pick the 2 best nights they have available to play.  If both nights are available to those players then both answers will work.  For our clan the best nights are thursday or friday for instance.  so i chose Thursday  and Friday as both could work best for us.  Again, the variable schedule has received the most votes so this really is only for a default day of the week.  So far Friday is in the lead for the default battle day which makes sense.  I was trying to avoid trying to take up peoples weekend evening nights though as this schedule goes on for many weeks.

 

Trying to avoid the weekend is why i originally chose Thursdays.

 


Edited by PostTraumatic, 29 April 2016 - 08:41 PM.


BuffaloTime #10 Posted 29 April 2016 - 09:50 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 20462 battles
  • 518
  • [3MNKY] 3MNKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012
I would like to make one comment on the maximum tier. Even tier 8 being the highest restricts newer players, tier 4 is not a bad tier to start with. I would like to see as many players included as possible. That is up to the clan leaders but that is my thought.

CrayoIaCrayon #11 Posted 29 April 2016 - 09:56 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 15841 battles
  • 1,025
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014
Personally I think our current tiers are fine.  Premiums are available in every tier, so even though it does cost money, everyone has the opportunity

Undefeated 1st place, Clantastrophy tournament

Air Raid 6  3rd place,  Air Raid 7  2nd place, Air Raid 8 1st place


PostTraumatic #12 Posted 29 April 2016 - 10:00 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostBuffaloTime, on 29 April 2016 - 04:50 PM, said:

I would like to make one comment on the maximum tier. Even tier 8 being the highest restricts newer players, tier 4 is not a bad tier to start with. I would like to see as many players included as possible. That is up to the clan leaders but that is my thought.

 

the issue with this is we have a limit of 12 clans that can participate.  that works out to almost 3 months of battles...  More would push this past a "seasonal" event and I do not think we are ready for 2 battles a week... 

 

This is also true:

View PostJetway, on 29 April 2016 - 04:56 PM, said:

Personally I think our current tiers are fine.  Premiums are available in every tier, so even though it does cost money, everyone has the opportunity


CrayoIaCrayon #13 Posted 29 April 2016 - 10:02 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 15841 battles
  • 1,025
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014
Yeah it is incredibly fast and easy to get to at least tier 6 in this game.  Tier 4 is way too low for any kind of competition.

Undefeated 1st place, Clantastrophy tournament

Air Raid 6  3rd place,  Air Raid 7  2nd place, Air Raid 8 1st place


BuffaloTime #14 Posted 29 April 2016 - 10:23 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 20462 battles
  • 518
  • [3MNKY] 3MNKY
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012

View PostPostTraumatic, on 29 April 2016 - 05:00 PM, said:

 

the issue with this is we have a limit of 12 clans that can participate.  that works out to almost 3 months of battles...  More would push this past a "seasonal" event and I do not think we are ready for 2 battles a week... 

 

This is also true:

 

​Valid.
 

View PostJetway, on 29 April 2016 - 05:02 PM, said:

Yeah it is incredibly fast and easy to get to at least tier 6 in this game.  Tier 4 is way too low for any kind of competition.

 

Agree on the fast part. Disagree about level of competition, those planes have speed, firepower and maneuverability and are fun.
 
 

Edited by BuffaloTime, 29 April 2016 - 10:24 PM.


PostTraumatic #15 Posted 29 April 2016 - 10:26 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 20069 battles
  • 882
  • [VULCN] VULCN
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
I will concede this.  All tiers are fun to compete in.  That is why I put the tier 2 tie breakers into the current event.

obamaphone #16 Posted 29 April 2016 - 10:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 13869 battles
  • 1,007
  • [GW__S] GW__S
  • Member since:
    12-22-2013
Keep up the good work PT, i have linked this on our forums for people to vote.

DInk_Spinkley #17 Posted 29 April 2016 - 11:01 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 10994 battles
  • 567
  • [-BFS-] -BFS-
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015
I'm sorry, I read that as "clamtastytrophy"
My wife said if I can make money playing video games, she'd leave me alone, so....

CrayoIaCrayon #18 Posted 30 April 2016 - 01:21 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 15841 battles
  • 1,025
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View PostBuffaloTime, on 29 April 2016 - 04:23 PM, said:

 

​Valid.
 

 

Agree on the fast part. Disagree about level of competition, those planes have speed, firepower and maneuverability and are fun.
 
 

 

the reason we go to tier 10 is because competitive events should take place at high tier.  Low tiers are only for beginners learning and to grind planes.  I realize some people/clans like to fly down there a lot to take advantage of weak bots and new players but high tiers is where any kind of truly competitive events should take place.

Undefeated 1st place, Clantastrophy tournament

Air Raid 6  3rd place,  Air Raid 7  2nd place, Air Raid 8 1st place


Nvfx #19 Posted 30 April 2016 - 03:05 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 21572 battles
  • 313
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    08-06-2012
[edited]

Edited by Envioux, 30 April 2016 - 08:21 AM.


cqiyuan #20 Posted 30 April 2016 - 06:41 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 13432 battles
  • 1,014
  • [X3M] X3M
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

Good.

Oh its THURSDAY btw. :honoring:







Also tagged with league, tournament

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users