Jump to content


Lets talk about patch notes 1.8

CT feedback

  • Please log in to reply
79 replies to this topic

Heh #41 Posted 06 May 2015 - 09:52 PM

    Sky Whale Historian

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 11,960
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 09:48 PM, said:

but it doesn't help with hitting moving targets.

 

Dammit. Aim is what I complain about in terms of lag. :c


Heh - aeromarine biologist

View Posthahiha, on , said:


OMG Heh you have had so many posts O_O

GouIdy #42 Posted 06 May 2015 - 09:56 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 17882 battles
  • 2,291
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 05:48 PM, said:

 

Lol, well the client side prediction lets you feel like you're lagging less, but it doesn't help with hitting moving targets. Found that out from this game.

 

The overheat change isn't that much of a change either, but the maneuverability is noticeable.

 

View PostHeh, on 06 May 2015 - 05:52 PM, said:

 

Dammit. Aim is what I complain about in terms of lag. :c

 

Well it's nice to know I will get better aircraft responsiveness but it's still pretty useless if you can't hit sheeit.

dityboycom #43 Posted 06 May 2015 - 09:57 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostThe_Original_Gouldy, on 06 May 2015 - 05:56 PM, said:

 

 

Well it's nice to know I will get better aircraft responsiveness but it's still pretty useless if you can't hit sheeit.

 

Yar, it's really just masking the problem. Not really correcting it, well not noticeably anyway. Someone who traditionally plays with higher ping might have a different experience. My CT server ping is 100.

WOW


GouIdy #44 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:03 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 17882 battles
  • 2,291
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 05:57 PM, said:

 

 My CT server ping is 100.

 

Dam you dity!

 

 



dityboycom #45 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:04 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014
pitch up key doesn't work as well anymore.

WOW


dityboycom #46 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:05 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014
1092 is no longer superior to the Mig-9. WG doesn't buff Russian planes, they nerf everything else around them.

WOW


HoH_Wolfblitz #47 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:06 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 18263 battles
  • 1,450
  • [WHAWK] WHAWK
  • Member since:
    12-07-2013

View PostJlNN, on 06 May 2015 - 09:28 PM, said:

 

Honestly, I see this as a net positive for us if they did eliminate it.  I end up getting fuel mainly due to the fact I think others are and want to keep my plane "top shelf".  If no one has it then we all save that money.

 

Will make the high tiers a bit cheaper to fly. That 10k (or 5k if you got it on sale) for kerosene cuts into profits quite a bit.



dityboycom #48 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:09 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 06:04 PM, said:

pitch up key doesn't work as well anymore.

 

Well, this turns out to just be the 1092 can't turn for crap anymore. FJ pitchup works just fine.

WOW


HoH_Wolfblitz #49 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 18263 battles
  • 1,450
  • [WHAWK] WHAWK
  • Member since:
    12-07-2013

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 10:09 PM, said:

 

Well, this turns out to just be the 1092 can't turn for crap anymore. FJ pitchup works just fine.

 

Really? 1092 needed a little nerf but not THAT much of one. So, you think it was over nerfed? Any clue what the stated time to turn 360 is? (Full disclosure: FJ-1 pilot here that was tired of getting clobbered by the legion of 1092s at tier 9 so I may be a little biased...)



dityboycom #50 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:14 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

ound

  • You now get a sound cue indicating when you’ve hit an enemy plane or target.

This sound is HORRIBLE, and incredibly annoying.

 

*Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick**Tick* *Tick* *Tick*


WOW


tanky_the_tank #51 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:50 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 13241 battles
  • 1,804
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 07:27 PM, said:

  • Improved Fire Extinguisher: Automatic activation disabled. Passive effect reducing chance of fire by 15% disabled. Added 15-second resistance to fire after use and possibility to use the consumable twice per battle.

 

That's pretty powerful, easy to catch on fire right after putting it out.

View Post Traurig_Yoda, on 14 March 2015 - 12:41 AM, said:

another ridiculous remark by TtT.

 


MagusGerhardt #52 Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:57 PM

    Horten Test Pilot

  • -Community Ace-
  • 7455 battles
  • 5,101
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:

 

Looks like the Me.P1092 nerfs are working as intended.  Now inferior in every way but altitude to equal tier Glorious Jet Fighter for People's Revolutionary Air Force.


 

 

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Paris, 13 Nov. 1787


SystemRename336 #53 Posted 06 May 2015 - 11:43 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 21935 battles
  • 210
  • Member since:
    09-05-2012

Ouch, i220, 1092, and the 1101 nerfed, brutal. Hatin on the high flyers. My personal list of awesome planes grows exceedingly shorter and shorter. Lets just make all the planes the same statistically and have different skins and shapes to represent nationality.  



dityboycom #54 Posted 06 May 2015 - 11:44 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostJules_Winfield, on 06 May 2015 - 07:43 PM, said:

Ouch, i220, 1092, and the 1101 nerfed, brutal. Hatin on the high flyers. My personal list of awesome planes grows exceedingly shorter and shorter. Lets just make all the planes the same statistically and have different skins and shapes to represent nationality.  

 

Just add the Mig-9 to that.

WOW


SystemRename336 #55 Posted 06 May 2015 - 11:49 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 21935 battles
  • 210
  • Member since:
    09-05-2012

View Postdityboycom, on 06 May 2015 - 06:44 PM, said:

 

Just add the Mig-9 to that.

 

IMO, that plane needs a 3 x 23 or a 4 x 23 option, or at very least a 2 x 23 with no 37 option. 

DrClone #56 Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:01 AM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 4934 battles
  • 369
  • Member since:
    10-27-2012
But....but....I use the gas on all my airplane. They allow me to boost better.

Autolycus7 #57 Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:02 AM

    Feedback Airedale

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 9207 battles
  • 1,744
  • Member since:
    10-24-2012
Psst. Community Whatsits. CT feedback threads plz.
Mountains are OP. Nerf plz.
Vis consili expers mole ruit sua.
Dignum laude virum Musa vetat mori, cœlo Musa beat.

MagusGerhardt #58 Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:06 AM

    Horten Test Pilot

  • -Community Ace-
  • 7455 battles
  • 5,101
  • [DRACS] DRACS
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostAutolycus7, on 06 May 2015 - 05:02 PM, said:

Psst. Community Whatsits. CT feedback threads plz.

 

Is anyone with a red name reading them this time?  :trollface:

 

 

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Paris, 13 Nov. 1787


dityboycom #59 Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:11 AM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10139 battles
  • 9,201
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostJules_Winfield, on 06 May 2015 - 07:49 PM, said:

 

IMO, that plane needs a 3 x 23 or a 4 x 23 option, or at very least a 2 x 23 with no 37 option. 

 

Irrelevant because its competitive with the 1092 now which was really its only threat at altitude to begin with.

WOW


Pertinacious #60 Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:12 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 6939 battles
  • 715
  • [-WS-] -WS-
  • Member since:
    02-24-2012

View PostMagusGerhardt, on 06 May 2015 - 06:57 PM, said:

 

Looks like the Me.P1092 nerfs are working as intended.  Now inferior in every way but altitude to equal tier Glorious Jet Fighter for People's Revolutionary Air Force.

 

Wasn't it like that even before the patch? 

 





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users