Jump to content


CT 1.6 Matchmaker


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
45 replies to this topic

Poll: Matchmaker (28 members have cast votes)

Has the number of ground attack and heavy fighters been less excessive per team?

  1. Yes, there is a more proportionate number of each plane class now. (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. There still seemed to be more HF/GAs per team, compared to fighters. (2 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  3. It was impossible to tell due to the low population on the test server. (19 votes [67.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 67.86%

Did you see a more even spread of tiers across teams?

  1. There was a balance between the number of planes 1 and 2 tiers lower than the top tier planes in battle. (19 votes [67.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 67.86%

  2. There seemed to be more planes 1 tier lower than the top tier planes in battle, and less planes 2 tiers lower. (8 votes [28.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

  3. There were still more planes 2 tiers lower than the top tier planes during battle, versus the number of planes 1 tier lower. (1 vote [3.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.57%

Did flights appear to be better balanced?

  1. In the flights that I saw on the Common Test server, the Matchmaker attempted to balance them out as best as possible. (5 votes [17.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.86%

  2. In some battles I noticed an uneven number of flights per team, where an even number of flights could have been created. (3-to-1 or more) (3 votes [10.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.71%

  3. I was unable to test this on the Common Test server due to the lack of number of flights. (20 votes [71.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.43%

Vote Hide poll

Kearney_1 #41 Posted 26 October 2014 - 10:06 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6602 battles
  • 45
  • [ACES_] ACES_
  • Member since:
    05-28-2014
Hmm I'm trying to see the reasoning behind getting stuck in a 3v3 when there are 25 same tier  planes in the Que... Then next match thrown into a higher tier battle being the only lower tier in the fight, this is a repeat and rinse, so if anyone thinks this is wonderful and a great fix or fun I beg to differ, I don't need someone telling me to learn to fly or being told to suck it up... loosing is no fun when its not fair or unbalanced:angry: To add insult to injury I've spent quite a bit of money on this game and now feel like I've been robbed and given a game that isn't as fun as it used to be thanks

Edited by Kearney_1, 26 October 2014 - 10:30 PM.


dityboycom #42 Posted 27 October 2014 - 02:42 AM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10175 battles
  • 9,207
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014
I'm trying to figure out why people continue to post in the test server sub-forum when they're not playing on the test server.

WOW


Tonzzo #43 Posted 27 October 2014 - 02:07 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 19569 battles
  • 3,052
  • [-WS-] -WS-
  • Member since:
    11-14-2013

View Postdityboycom, on 27 October 2014 - 03:42 AM, said:

I'm trying to figure out why people continue to post in the test server sub-forum when they're not playing on the test server.

 

Uh....  Because had WG listened when it was in TEST they would not have shoved it to live. What you want us to flood the forums with a bunch of threads about MM having long waits and small battles?

 

WG YOUR MM is a FAIL FEST!!!! Thanks for the X3 over the weekend. Never could do them all since I had 4 to 22!!  Minute waits!!!!!  To be fair it may have been longer then 22 but I screenshoted and logged out and updated my WT......

 

 

 



 


Devilhunter50 #44 Posted 27 October 2014 - 02:56 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 4457 battles
  • 56
  • Member since:
    01-25-2012

Here feed back  8 minutes for a 3 v 3 match in tier 4, to make matter worst there was up to 25 people in q waiting in the first 5 minutes and the match maker couldn't make a match with 25 tier 4 in q so you f-up again at least the match maker was work before 1.4.1

 

and for your test server " there nobody on to test " why you ask, because no one want to grind there plane in the freak test server. 1 thing the wot got right was you can open every line of tanks to test.


Edited by Devilhunter50, 27 October 2014 - 02:58 PM.


dityboycom #45 Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:34 PM

    Colonel

  • Member
  • 10175 battles
  • 9,207
  • [BAGG] BAGG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostTonzzo, on 27 October 2014 - 10:07 AM, said:

 

Uh....  Because had WG listened when it was in TEST they would not have shoved it to live. What you want us to flood the forums with a bunch of threads about MM having long waits and small battles?

 

WG YOUR MM is a FAIL FEST!!!! Thanks for the X3 over the weekend. Never could do them all since I had 4 to 22!!  Minute waits!!!!!  To be fair it may have been longer then 22 but I screenshoted and logged out and updated my WT......

 

 

 

 

View PostDevilhunter50, on 27 October 2014 - 10:56 AM, said:

Here feed back  8 minutes for a 3 v 3 match in tier 4, to make matter worst there was up to 25 people in q waiting in the first 5 minutes and the match maker couldn't make a match with 25 tier 4 in q so you f-up again at least the match maker was work before 1.4.1

 

and for your test server " there nobody on to test " why you ask, because no one want to grind there plane in the freak test server. 1 thing the wot got right was you can open every line of tanks to test.

 

View PostWhiskeyInYourWater, on 27 October 2014 - 11:42 AM, said:

Seven minutes with 15 planes in my tier plus one up or one down to get a 1v1 match. Over, and over, and over...

 

My only point is..

 

http://forum.worldof...ack-matchmaker/

 

They're not checking this thread, the CT is closed. Using the correct thread is always more productive than posting a relic.


WOW


Tonzzo #46 Posted 27 October 2014 - 07:39 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 19569 battles
  • 3,052
  • [-WS-] -WS-
  • Member since:
    11-14-2013

Good question. Seems odd that Gunlion would post multiple threads on the same thing. And not close the older one.  Thank our lucky stars for you knowing all things forum related.  I will do my best to only post in the newer thread about feedback on the same thing that WG didn't listen to either....  

 

Thanks again!



 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users