Also... the following stat (player name removed) really skews the balancing ranking of the F7U. I want to know if it's really as nerfed as I predicted they made it, or if it's in fact somewhat decent.... but this player's spamming battle and pubbing out really kills the stat.
Even simply eliminating the single .4x% there, which is the lowest WR of the plane... and the largest sample... [but focusing on the % with accounting battles], you get 661/1176 battles won, for battles 10 or more.... = 56.21% WR. If I calculated the battles and even gave him that average WR, it would show 661+ 828= 1489... / 1176+ 1474 = 2650 ... =1490/2650=56.189 , or 56.2% WR, which is well above the ~50% it's showing now.
Why do I bother calculating this? Well, it's at least above average in terms of a moderate to competitive nature of play. Of course, I gotta do this for every plane there is.
Reason for all this? I'm happy that we have a site that shows the top players at 10 or more battles for each plane... and is updating it. This allows me to decide what planes would be at least average to good in a moderate (pub) to competitive (CW/tournaments) nature of gameplay.
Note: I also always take outlier stats out of the picture, such as one person being 90% while the next highest is 70%, means that is extremely above the cut of players,and the lowest [if assuming massive #'s of battles] is the outlier of the bad players.
name removed | 1,4xx |
4x% |
Edited by RocketSpammer1, 24 July 2014 - 09:24 AM.