Jump to content


[spoiler] what the British tech tree could look like

United Kingdom Royal Air Force Fairey Bristol Supermarine Hawker Gloster De Havilland Westland Blackburn

  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

hoom #81 Posted 19 May 2018 - 03:22 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 3538 battles
  • 589
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Looking at other Trees/Lines I don't see any problem at all with Lights to T3 then Multiroles T4+ when we have existing examples like German Ta 152 line: T1 Multirole, T2-4 Light, T5-7 Multirole, T8-10 Light again.


C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le SerB.

jack_wdw #82 Posted 12 June 2018 - 04:29 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 738 battles
  • 324
  • Member since:
    09-28-2012
I read that with the next major upgradet, DH Vampire F.1 will be available for supertesters as a tier VIII aircraft.

J311yfish #83 Posted 16 June 2018 - 10:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 508 battles
  • 1,160
  • [343] 343
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013

View Postjack_wdw, on 12 June 2018 - 11:29 AM, said:

I read that with the next major upgradet, DH Vampire F.1 will be available for supertesters as a tier VIII aircraft.

 

Thanks for the update.

 

Update 2.05 -- 06/12/18

 New aircraft available for developers and Supertesters only for testing purposes:


De Havilland DH.100 Vampire F.1: British Tier VIII fighter

 

Added some notes here under Tier VIII premiums:

-- Vampire F.1 first flight 04/20/1945

-- Vampire F.1 trials 06/1945

-- Goblin 1 engine

 

Incidentally, here are some related facts:

-- Curtiss XF15C is also tier VIII and its J36 engine is an Americanized version of the De Havilland H1-B Goblin. (Bowers, 506-507)

-- Saab 21R for Sweden -- this is another indication that it would be tier VIII.


Edited by J311yfish, 17 June 2018 - 11:05 AM.

Tech tree projects:  JAPAN    UNITED KINGDOM  //  Italy    France  //  Sweden    Finland (skins)    Poland    China    Brazil    UNITED STATES   GERMANY

Map proposals:  Panama Canal    Great Wall of China    Cliffs of Dover  //  Clan:  343 Kokutai  //  Tutorial How to ignore forum posts and signatures


Trophy_Wench #84 Posted 21 June 2018 - 02:17 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1241 battles
  • 88
  • [TWE] TWE
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Hey Jelly, another question about your lineups. Well two actually.

One: as I mentioned before I found the early Gloster fighters to be difficult to justify as true MRs but would it perhaps be more feasible to create a German style mini-branch through tier IV with the Gladiator still unlocking both the Hurricane MR and the F.5/34 LF at tier IV, and that would just unlock the Spit? I unfortunately cannot find any way to make a complete and coherent line of Gloster fighters after that point. 

 

Secondly: are the turret fighters really viable for this game? Looking at that line more closely, I worry that the Fairey Fulmar and Firefly are tiered too high, and that to bring them down a tier you have to start eliminating those previous turret fighters. IMO the most logical one would be the Roc as it was meant to be used in tandem with as opposed to replacing the Skua. So it's performance wouldn't really be superior in any way. But even with that, does the Bolton Paul Defiant have a place in this game at all? I'm not convinced it does, so with that said I would see that line go Skua, ... something..., Fulmar, Firefly, Firebrand, and then the DeHaviland fighters. Any thoughts?



hoom #85 Posted 21 June 2018 - 12:37 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 3538 battles
  • 589
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
They could just give the Skua the Beaufighter treatment: ie top config is same as current except with the quad mg turret added as rear gunner upgrade with only small performance penalty. (historic Beaufighter with that turret had no other armament except 2* 20mm)
C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le SerB.

Trophy_Wench #86 Posted 21 June 2018 - 05:53 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 1241 battles
  • 88
  • [TWE] TWE
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Posthoom, on 21 June 2018 - 12:37 PM, said:

They could just give the Skua the Beaufighter treatment: ie top config is same as current except with the quad mg turret added as rear gunner upgrade with only small performance penalty. (historic Beaufighter with that turret had no other armament except 2* 20mm)

 

Mmmm, I don't know if it would be sensible or balanced to do so. Keep in mind that the Roc has NO forward firing armament, all of its firepower is in that turret. And hybrid-izing the Skua might make it OP with a quad .303 turret that can traverse 360 degrees.

Edited by Trophy_Wench, 21 June 2018 - 05:54 PM.


hoom #87 Posted 22 June 2018 - 05:07 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 3538 battles
  • 589
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

Oh I know and agree.

Just a passive-aggressive continuation of my argument from 'Nerf Beaufighter' thread :hiding:


C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le SerB.

J311yfish #88 Posted 24 June 2018 - 01:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 508 battles
  • 1,160
  • [343] 343
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013

View PostTrophy_Wench, on 20 June 2018 - 09:17 PM, said:

Secondly: are the turret fighters really viable for this game? 

 

I don't have an answer for that and it isn't up to me.  However, 1) the game is under development; 2) turret fighters existed for a time.  It is a decision for developers to make. One of my primary goals (with all tech tree projects) has been to provide a context to understand developer decisions.  The tech tree manifested here does not have to be 100% accurate to the game, but it should be accurate to actual historical progression as much as possible so that deviations from history are rendered clear and obvious (Ex: absence of Gladiator).

 

View PostTrophy_Wench, on 20 June 2018 - 09:17 PM, said:

I worry that the Fairey Fulmar and Firefly are tiered too high, and that to bring them down a tier you have to start eliminating those previous turret fighters. 

 

Placement at each tier has been determined by historical context (specifications, first flight, service entry, narrative, etc.) as well as by comparison to modules known to exist already in-game.

 

The Roc for example has a tier VI Boulton-Paul turret.

The Fulmar Mk.II for example has a tier VI Rolls-Royce Merlin engine.

The Firefly for example has a tier VIII Rolls-Royce Griffon engine.

 

If you are determined to eliminate the turret fighters (in order to pretend that they never existed or never influenced the design conversation) then you will absolutely have difficulty making a cohesive progression.

 

View PostTrophy_Wench, on 20 June 2018 - 09:17 PM, said:

IMO the most logical one would be the Roc as it was meant to be used in tandem with as opposed to replacing the Skua. So it's performance wouldn't really be superior in any way. 

 

The relationship between one tier and the next is not based on simply "this replaced that."

 

View PostTrophy_Wench, on 20 June 2018 - 09:17 PM, said:

does the Bolton Paul Defiant have a place in this game at all? I'm not convinced it does

 

That is a developer decision and the game is still under development.  It is not up to me and I have no interest in making a case for or against its inclusion. 

 

View PostTrophy_Wench, on 20 June 2018 - 09:17 PM, said:

so with that said I would see that line go Skua, ... something..., Fulmar, Firefly, Firebrand, and then the DeHaviland fighters. Any thoughts?

 

That doesn't make sense to me but you are welcome to pursue the idea further if you think it makes sense to you.  I recommend looking at it from many different angles to see how it satisfies chronology, specifications, features, etc.

 

Note that, based on some hints in the historical narrative, that we might actually see De Havilland Vampire as progression from the existing Hawker mini-line.  See Frank Halford (engine designer), and notes on use of aircraft in a ground attack role.

 

 

Tech tree projects:  JAPAN    UNITED KINGDOM  //  Italy    France  //  Sweden    Finland (skins)    Poland    China    Brazil    UNITED STATES   GERMANY

Map proposals:  Panama Canal    Great Wall of China    Cliffs of Dover  //  Clan:  343 Kokutai  //  Tutorial How to ignore forum posts and signatures





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users