Jump to content


P40-M105 downgrade in 5.1 update.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
7 replies to this topic

Sheolraver #1 Posted 19 August 2013 - 04:54 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 6 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013
167 points down on damage given, from 256 to 89, seems a bit extreme, particularly in light of the accuracy downgrade. Perhaps you could have balanced it a little differently by spreading it out some.
Speed:475
Maneuverability: 240
Firepower: 225
or some such.
Sad day.
Northrop P-61B Black Widow Lady in the Dark 548th Night Fighter Squadron
Credited with the last 2 kills of WW2, forcing 2 Japanese fighters into the sea.

Stieger #2 Posted 19 August 2013 - 05:39 PM

    Senior Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 224
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
Screenshot 110 before patch 5.1
Screenshot 5.1 164
All a/c firepower has their indicators or numbers changed

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_110.jpg   53.62K
  • Attached File   shot_164.jpg   52.62K

Edited by Stieger, 19 August 2013 - 05:41 PM.


PanzerXO #3 Posted 29 August 2013 - 03:36 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 757
  • Member since:
    05-23-2012
Yeah, I am quite disappointed by this.  Was a fun plane to fly - now it's kind of a pig in the sky, with a tickler rather than a killer...

View PostRosebud, on , said:


...By flying into the middle you are boldly stating that you are a noob and haven’t learned your lesson yet.
ROSEBUD

Panzer_Leader_3 #4 Posted 29 August 2013 - 07:02 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Open Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 738
  • Member since:
    02-22-2013
And to think that I would have gotten that over the P-39Q Airacobra and the Me 210

If you see a Panzer flying a 109, you are probably already dead.-Me.
Normal expression of my enemies: --___--
Antigravity Squirrel reprograms your face.
#DontDissTanksFlyingPlanes

Mercsn #5 Posted 03 September 2013 - 06:49 AM

    Captain

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 2334 battles
  • 3,124
  • Member since:
    04-17-2013
It looks like 0.4 sec longer for a 360 degree turn.  Firepower is the same in relative terms.  The firepower number is no longe a weapon damage total so every plane had their number drop.

If you are a goob who puts rockets (or bombs when possible) on your light fighters that will further degrade performance, moreso than pre 5.1, with no appreciable increase to battle effectiveness.

All the Important Thread Links (go here for answers!) Might be outdated!

All-in-one thread with 2.0 related guide links.

 

The below was said to me (Mercsn), from a concerned player:

Edited, on 12 March - 2:01PM , said:

and PS...play more, forum less.  Your opinion might be more credible.

Mercsn #6 Posted 03 September 2013 - 06:56 AM

    Captain

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 2334 battles
  • 3,124
  • Member since:
    04-17-2013

View PostPanzer_Leader_3, on 29 August 2013 - 07:02 PM, said:

And to think that I would have gotten that over the P-39Q Airacobra and the Me 210

With the p40m105 and me210, you are comparing apples to oranges.  Regarding the p39, you need good aim to make use of the fast overheating canon.

All the Important Thread Links (go here for answers!) Might be outdated!

All-in-one thread with 2.0 related guide links.

 

The below was said to me (Mercsn), from a concerned player:

Edited, on 12 March - 2:01PM , said:

and PS...play more, forum less.  Your opinion might be more credible.

IRCrimson #7 Posted 16 September 2013 - 05:50 AM

    Master Sergeant

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
I didn't know you could lower the stall speed of an airframe by adding weight. I'd love to see the math behind that.

TheGreenTank #8 Posted 16 September 2013 - 06:10 AM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Alpha tester
  • 0 battles
  • 939
  • [MEMES] MEMES
  • Member since:
    01-11-2012
Only 2 things I miss on my P-40-M105 right now...is the longer engine durability when boosting, and the accuracy nerfing.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users