Jump to content


US tech tree


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
252 replies to this topic

i_am_the_boss #241 Posted 28 June 2013 - 04:42 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013
evrybody seemes worried about the fighters and almost no one pays attention to the bombers they had an important role

Heh #242 Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:42 AM

    Sky Whale Historian

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 10,812
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Posti_am_the_boss, on 28 June 2013 - 04:42 AM, said:

evrybody seemes worried about the fighters and almost no one pays attention to the bombers they had an important role

Because we're not getting player-controlled bombers. Has been confirmed for quite a long time now.
Heh - aeromarine biologist

View Posthahiha, on , said:


OMG Heh you have had so many posts O_O

PanzerXO #243 Posted 28 June 2013 - 01:54 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 7 battles
  • 757
  • Member since:
    05-23-2012
But Heh, I want to start dropping bombs from the start of the game and never stop until the end of the game.

I mean forty 200 lb bombs from 11,000 feet should get me a supremacy win now and then, right?

View PostRosebud, on , said:


...By flying into the middle you are boldly stating that you are a noob and haven’t learned your lesson yet.
ROSEBUD

ladolego #244 Posted 29 June 2013 - 05:43 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 122 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    05-26-2012

View Postluk1111, on 28 December 2011 - 04:04 AM, said:

Can't believe they added the flying pancake, especially in the first release.

A quote from wikipedia:




So maybe it's going to be a very tough, maneuverable plane.
If so then wargaming will either
A: Make the guns suck, or
B: Make it not as maneuverable and durable as it was

What do you guys think?

I don't know, but I think I may have found a possible carrier-based high-altitude fighter-bomber premium plane addition for the US tech tree. Look this up on Wikipedia: 1954 Beachcraft Tango T-34

Probably a Korean War prototype plane that resurfaced later on, because it was used in the Vietnam War.

Probably also could outperform the 2PA-L in weapons testing, speed, manuverability, etc.

Heh #245 Posted 29 June 2013 - 08:15 PM

    Sky Whale Historian

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 10,812
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postladolego, on 29 June 2013 - 05:43 PM, said:

I don't know, but I think I may have found a possible carrier-based high-altitude fighter-bomber premium plane addition for the US tech tree. Look this up on Wikipedia: 1954 Beachcraft Tango T-34

Probably a Korean War prototype plane that resurfaced later on, because it was used in the Vietnam War.

Probably also could outperform the 2PA-L in weapons testing, speed, manuverability, etc.

I don't see it.
Heh - aeromarine biologist

View Posthahiha, on , said:


OMG Heh you have had so many posts O_O

pjallday18 #246 Posted 02 July 2013 - 02:27 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013
awesome possum