Jump to content


US tech tree


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
252 replies to this topic

Crag_r #241 Posted 23 April 2013 - 11:32 PM

    Captain

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 4,766
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Posttodd23, on 23 April 2013 - 06:10 PM, said:

hi know that this plan was a canadain but i would love to see the avro arrow 206 in the game

No guns, supersonic Aircraft. No chance of been in game.



Per Ardua ad Astra "Through Adversity to the Stars"


Royal Australian Air Force


FRAG


SapperDon #242 Posted 30 May 2013 - 05:43 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    09-02-2012
I really hope they introduce the P38J sometime. I have flown in 3 different PC based warbird games and this plane was fantastic in the Pacific war scenario. Two of the games are Janes WW11 fighters and Aces of the Pacific/ over Europe by Sierra.

Loganis #243 Posted 30 May 2013 - 06:59 PM

    Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    01-27-2013
I would love to see a Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender in wowp,maybe WG will release it with 3-4 other push propeller aircraft in future.

dvldog69 #244 Posted 15 June 2013 - 03:47 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013
I as well would love to see the P-38. Although some did not like it, those that piloted it for awhile loved it.
You may kill me, but be assured that I will take you to Hell with me....

Sbb123 #245 Posted 21 June 2013 - 09:45 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    01-18-2013
u need to add 4 engine aircraft like the b17 flying fortress

Heh #246 Posted 21 June 2013 - 10:41 PM

    Sky Whale Historian

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 10,659
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View PostSbb123, on 21 June 2013 - 09:45 PM, said:

u need to add 4 engine aircraft like the b17 flying fortress

However, don't expect it to be playable.
Heh - aeromarine biologist

View Posthahiha, on , said:


OMG Heh you have had so many posts O_O

Sbb123 #247 Posted 21 June 2013 - 11:11 PM

    Airman Basic

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    01-18-2013
bigger maps would be nice also

i_am_the_boss #248 Posted 28 June 2013 - 04:42 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013
evrybody seemes worried about the fighters and almost no one pays attention to the bombers they had an important role

Heh #249 Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:42 AM

    Sky Whale Historian

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 10,659
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Posti_am_the_boss, on 28 June 2013 - 04:42 AM, said:

evrybody seemes worried about the fighters and almost no one pays attention to the bombers they had an important role

Because we're not getting player-controlled bombers. Has been confirmed for quite a long time now.
Heh - aeromarine biologist

View Posthahiha, on , said:


OMG Heh you have had so many posts O_O

PanzerXO #250 Posted 28 June 2013 - 01:54 PM

    Command Chief Master Sergeant

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 757
  • Member since:
    05-23-2012
But Heh, I want to start dropping bombs from the start of the game and never stop until the end of the game.

I mean forty 200 lb bombs from 11,000 feet should get me a supremacy win now and then, right?

View PostRosebud, on , said:


...By flying into the middle you are boldly stating that you are a noob and haven’t learned your lesson yet.
ROSEBUD

ladolego #251 Posted 29 June 2013 - 05:43 PM

    Senior Airman

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    05-26-2012

View Postluk1111, on 28 December 2011 - 04:04 AM, said:

Can't believe they added the flying pancake, especially in the first release.

A quote from wikipedia:




So maybe it's going to be a very tough, maneuverable plane.
If so then wargaming will either
A: Make the guns suck, or
B: Make it not as maneuverable and durable as it was

What do you guys think?

I don't know, but I think I may have found a possible carrier-based high-altitude fighter-bomber premium plane addition for the US tech tree. Look this up on Wikipedia: 1954 Beachcraft Tango T-34

Probably a Korean War prototype plane that resurfaced later on, because it was used in the Vietnam War.

Probably also could outperform the 2PA-L in weapons testing, speed, manuverability, etc.

Heh #252 Posted 29 June 2013 - 08:15 PM

    Sky Whale Historian

  • Closed Beta Tester
  • 0 battles
  • 10,659
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012

View Postladolego, on 29 June 2013 - 05:43 PM, said:

I don't know, but I think I may have found a possible carrier-based high-altitude fighter-bomber premium plane addition for the US tech tree. Look this up on Wikipedia: 1954 Beachcraft Tango T-34

Probably a Korean War prototype plane that resurfaced later on, because it was used in the Vietnam War.

Probably also could outperform the 2PA-L in weapons testing, speed, manuverability, etc.

I don't see it.
Heh - aeromarine biologist

View Posthahiha, on , said:


OMG Heh you have had so many posts O_O

pjallday18 #253 Posted 02 July 2013 - 02:27 AM

    Airman Basic

  • Member
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013
awesome possum